an be produced stably with at least 64 modules.
> Note that we need to add the --date jmod option to avoid the timestamp issue.
>
> Testing:
> Added test case fails without fix for JDK-8240734, and passes otherwise.
> Tested with tier2 on linux x86.
Dongbo He has updated the
On Fri, 25 Mar 2022 11:54:52 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
> The existing tests for the jmod tool are in test/jdk/tools/jmod.
> HashesTest.java might provide inspiration to avoid introducing a shell test.
Hi, Alan
I have rewritten this test in Java in the latest commit.
-
PR:
an be produced stably with at least 64 modules.
> Note that we need to add the --date jmod option to avoid the timestamp issue.
>
> Testing:
> Added test case fails without fix for JDK-8240734, and passes otherwise.
> Tested with tier2 on linux x86.
Dongbo He has updated the pul
This creates a regression test for JDK-8240734. This was once blocked
by a time stamp issue which has been resolved by: [JDK-8276766
](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8276766)
We found the issue can always be produced with at least 64 modules.
Note that we need to add the --date jmod
an be produced stably with at least 64 modules.
> Note that we need to add the --date jmod option to avoid the timestamp issue.
>
> Testing:
> Added test case fails without fix for JDK-8240734, and passes otherwise.
> Tested with tier2 on linux x86.
Dongbo He has updated the
hat we need to add the --date jmod option to avoid the timestamp issue.
>
> Testing:
> Added test case fails before JDK-8240734, and passes after JDK-8240734.
> Tested with tier2 on linux x86.
Dongbo He has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit
since the last
On Fri, 25 Mar 2022 11:54:52 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
>> Dongbo He has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Get date by 'date +%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%S%:z'
>
> The existing tests for the jmod t
On Fri, 8 Apr 2022 09:26:08 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
> I think this looks okay. Can you say how long the test runs for you? It
> creates 130 JMOD files and I'm just wondering if the default timeout is
> enough when running with debug builds.
The following is the test result on linux x86 with
On Wed, 30 Mar 2022 01:55:30 GMT, Dongbo He wrote:
>> This creates a regression test for
>> [JDK-8240734](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8240734). This was
>> once blocked
>> by a time stamp issue which has been resolved by: [JDK-8276766
>> ](https:
On Fri, 25 Mar 2022 01:50:04 GMT, Dongbo He wrote:
> This creates a regression test for
> [JDK-8240734](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8240734). This was
> once blocked
> by a time stamp issue which has been resolved by: [JDK-8276766
> ](https://bugs.openjdk.java
10 matches
Mail list logo