On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 11:50 AM, Joel Borggrén-Franck <
joel.borggren.fra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks for the update. I think it makes sense to expand testing
> slightly, testing all three parsing clauses that you fixed, and for
> all three of them also checking that a "thing" after the broken
Hello,
This change fixes a regression in JDK 9 by allowing the java.util and zipfs
zip implementations to read archives where the modified day or month is 0.
bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8184940
webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~cushon/8184940/webrev.00/
Thanks,
Liam
On Sun, 6 Jun 2021 20:09:32 GMT, Liam Miller-Cushon wrote:
> This change fixes a build error during the generation of
> `ScopedMemoryAccess.java` when the sources are readonly, by using `cat a > b`
> instead of `cp a b` to avoid propagating the permissions to the generat
8266857: PipedOutputStream.sink should be volatile
-
Commit messages:
- 8266857: PipedOutputStream.sink should be volatile
Changes: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/3960/files
Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.java.net/?repo=jdk=3960=00
Issue:
On Mon, 10 May 2021 23:25:46 GMT, Liam Miller-Cushon wrote:
> 8266857: PipedOutputStream.sink should be volatile
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: d0daa725
Author: Liam Miller-Cushon
URL:
https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/com
On Tue, 11 May 2021 10:19:52 GMT, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
> For correctness (and peace of mind)- we should probably introduce a local
> variable in all the places where `sink` is read more than once outside of a
> synchronized block
Done, thanks!
-
PR:
> 8266857: PipedOutputStream.sink should be volatile
Liam Miller-Cushon has refreshed the contents of this pull request, and
previous commits have been removed. The incremental views will show differences
compared to the previous content of the PR. The pull request contains one new
com
This change fixes a build error during the generation of
`ScopedMemoryAccess.java` when the sources are readonly, by using `cat a > b`
instead of `cp a b` to avoid propagating the permissions to the generated
source.
-
Commit messages:
- 8268296: ScopedMemoryAccess build error
> Please review this fix to add `ElementType.MODULE` to the default list of
> annotation targets, to allow annotations without an explicit `@Target` to be
> used on module declarations.
Liam Miller-Cushon has refreshed the contents of this pull request, and
previous commits have bee
On Thu, 4 Feb 2021 21:04:51 GMT, Liam Miller-Cushon wrote:
>> Thanks, I was missing context here. I now realize this patch is fixing a bug
>> related to
>> [JDK-8254023](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8254023)--when the
>> handling of annotations witho
On Thu, 28 Jan 2021 22:33:53 GMT, Liam Miller-Cushon wrote:
> Please review this fix to add `ElementType.MODULE` to the default list of
> annotation targets, to allow annotations without an explicit `@Target` to be
> used on module declarations.
This pull request has been closed with
This change improves an exception message to include a path, e.g. `Invalid Jar
file: some.jar` instead of just `Invalid Jar file`.
The exception is currently [always being caught and
This change removes support for `-Dsun.misc.URLClassPath.disableJarChecking`.
As discussed in the bug the feature doesn't current work, and only ever
supported scenarios where a security manager is installed, so it seems safe to
remove.
-
Commit messages:
- 8283340: Remove
On Fri, 18 Mar 2022 18:59:16 GMT, Sean Mullan wrote:
>> I don't know what the motivation for this change is but there is more to
>> this story and I think will require agreement from the security area before
>> removing it.
>
> I agree with @AlanBateman. Please don't proceed with this fix
On Fri, 18 Mar 2022 04:01:05 GMT, Jiangli Zhou wrote:
>> This change removes support for
>> `-Dsun.misc.URLClassPath.disableJarChecking`. As discussed in the bug the
>> feature doesn't current work, and only ever supported scenarios where a
>> security manager is installed, so it seems safe
On Thu, 17 Mar 2022 23:44:32 GMT, Liam Miller-Cushon wrote:
> This change removes support for `-Dsun.misc.URLClassPath.disableJarChecking`.
> As discussed in the bug the feature doesn't current work, and only ever
> supported scenarios where a security manager is installed, so it s
On Fri, 18 Mar 2022 08:39:46 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
> I don't know what the motivation for this change is but there is more to this
> story and I think will require agreement from the security area before
> removing it.
Thanks @AlanBateman. The motivation is that I was investigating an
17 matches
Mail list logo
