On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 02:31:25PM +1000, David Holmes wrote:
As I recently fell into the trap of forgetting the synchronized block
around a single notifyAll(), I believe, the current situation is just
errorprone.
How is it errorprone? You forgot to acquire the lock and you got an
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 03:01:29PM -0700, Steven Schlansker wrote:
On Apr 17, 2015, at 2:37 PM, Remi Forax fo...@univ-mlv.fr wrote:
As you can see the code is not bad but the code of chain() could be
simplified
if there was a way on Optional to call a Supplier of Optional if an
such contortions.
A CCC will be filed.
Thanks,
Paul.
Hi Paul,
My name is Andreas Lundblad, and I joined the langtools team a little more than
a year ago. I'm not a Reviewer or anything but I casually read through your
patch out of curiosity.
You don't seem to be a fan of the ?: operator. I would
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 02:55:28PM -0800, Brian Burkhalter wrote:
On Jan 8, 2015, at 7:13 AM, Andreas Lundblad andreas.lundb...@oracle.com
wrote:
Although I was the one who brought it up, I think the whole
ComparatorNumber discussion is slightly off topic. I still think
On the matter of writing a ComparatorNumber, the basic problem is
the Number interface is not strong enough to allow you to write such
functionality.
First, the Number type basically only means convertible to a
primitive. There are no strict requirements on consistency between
the
On Mon, Jan 05, 2015 at 05:43:26PM -0800, Joseph D. Darcy wrote:
Hello,
Getting back to this issue in the new year, taking a closer look at
the existing class-level documentation, I don't really see a
compelling case for an edit this large.
I for one would be content if the bug were
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 03:18:49PM -0800, Brian Burkhalter wrote:
Andreas,
Doesn’t the class documentation of Number [1] provide sufficient clarity, to
wit:
The specific semantics of the conversion from the numeric value of a
particular Number implementation to a given primitive type is
has gone missing. Where did the bug report go, and why didn't I get any
notification about the removal?)
-- Andreas Lundblad
On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 01:10:29PM +0100, Jan Lahoda wrote:
Hi,
In a preparation for JDK-8061549, I'd like to rename all uses of '_'
as a one-character identifier in the jaxp and jdk repositories. All
the uses I was able to find are in tests, and the identifier is used
as a name of a catch
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 07:21:38PM -0800, Joseph Darcy wrote:
Hello,
Catching up on email, the specification of java.lang.Class does not
explicitly promise that its notion of equality must be identity for
all time. Therefore, while not required for today's implementations,
I would prefer
reports:
http://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8006730
-- Andreas Lundblad
/browse/JDK-8027470
-- Andreas Lundblad
to web review:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~alundblad/8016725/webrev.00
Link to bug report:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8016725
-- Andreas Lundblad
. The test passes after
applying the patch.
best regards,
Andreas Lundblad
On Tue 22 Oct 2013 12:21:36 PM CEST, Joel Borggrén-Franck wrote:
Hi Andreas,
A few nits:
Class.java:
import java.util.Collection;
+import java.util.Collections;
import java.util.HashSet;
unused import.
Right. Thanks.
AnnotationSupport.java:
+/**
+ * Equivalent to calling
. this file is in the langtools repo)
Link to web review:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~alundblad/8019420-and-8004912/
Link to bug reports:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8004912
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8019420
-- Andreas Lundblad
review:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~alundblad/8019420-and-8004912/
Link to bug reports:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8004912
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8019420
-- Andreas Lundblad
17 matches
Mail list logo
