It sounds to me like we need additional means to protect the file
permission without canocialization. I am looking forward to seeing the new
proposal with appropriate solution for problem Peter raised.
Thanks a lot!
2015-02-09 14:50 GMT+08:00 Wang Weijun weijun.w...@oracle.com:
On Feb 9,
. Is there any doc or link for this new
proposal? Or if you can update the information for this proposal here, I
will be very appreciate!
Thanks a lot!
2015-02-09 11:51 GMT+08:00 Wang Weijun weijun.w...@oracle.com:
On Feb 9, 2015, at 11:22, deven you ydwch...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Weijun,
I see JDK
: FilePermission makes symlinks useless
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-4141872
This will be a very big incompatible change and we are still doing a
feasibility study.
Of course, we won't touch jdk8u or earlier.
Thanks
Max
On Feb 6, 2015, at 14:09, deven you ydwch...@gmail.com
Hi All,
I have updated the patch[1] according to above discussion. Please review it.
Thanks a lot
[1] http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~youdwei/ojdk-912/webrev.03/
2015-02-03 16:04 GMT+08:00 Peter Levart peter.lev...@gmail.com:
Hi Deven,
On 02/03/2015 08:42 AM, deven you wrote:
Hi Sean
Hi Sean,
The performance degradation was reported by creating an object with always
getting its canonical path and there is no degradation heard after we made
the lazy load patch for the canonical path.
I have asked related people to give me an env to create this problem so
that I can take a
and this patch will specifically solve the problem for
FilePermssion.
I will update the patch soon with your suggestion and Wenjian's.
Thanks a lot!
2014-12-01 20:50 GMT+08:00 Alan Bateman alan.bate...@oracle.com:
On 01/12/2014 08:06, deven you wrote:
Hi All,
File.getCanonicalPath
...@oracle.com:
Do you need some kind of synchronization on the get_dir_rec() method?
--Max
On Dec 1, 2014, at 16:06, deven you youd...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
Hi All,
File.getCanonicalPath() is a very time-consuming method, we observed
significant performance degradation from some
, this is an optimization for the case a security
manager is not present? For the other case, maybe having absolute but not
canonical file names is an option? Or maybe have a special optimization for
JAVA_HOME prefixed names? Or does it help in that case as well?
Gruss
Bernd
Am 01.12.2014 09:18 schrieb deven
Hi All,
I have updated the patch[3] to reflect all of your suggestions.
[3] http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~youdwei/ojdk-912/webrev.02/
Thanks a lot!
2014-12-05 10:39 GMT+08:00 deven you ydwch...@gmail.com:
Hi Alan,
I am not clear whether canonicalization cache enabled or disabled, however
I
Hi All,
File.getCanonicalPath() is a very time-consuming method, we observed
significant performance degradation from some application's startup stage
with java.io.FilePermission. However, lazying load the calls to
getCanonicalPath() from java.ioFilePermission is straightforward and solve
this
Hi All,
I have a question about repeated annotation depth. If this is not the
proper mailing list group, please tell me where I should send it to.
My question will be about the depth of container annotations. For instance,
assume there are 3 annotations.
- RepeatedAnn
- ContainerAnn
-
Hi All,
I didn't see this mail in the mailing list for a long time, so I just
comment here to ensure everyone can receive this message.
Thanks a lot!
On 06/04/2013 09:37 PM, Deven You wrote:
Hi All,
I have written a test case[1] to show this problem. (If it is
confirmed a real bug, I
23, 2012, at 3:07 AM, Deven You wrote:
Hi Lance,
Is there any plan for this issue, if any could you update to me?
Thanks a lot!
On 10/29/2012 06:39 PM, Lance Andersen - Oracle wrote:
Hi Deven,
I will address the needed updates a bit later.
Thank you for your input
Best
Lance
On Oct 29, 2012
Hi Lance,
Is there any plan for this issue, if any could you update to me?
Thanks a lot!
On 10/29/2012 06:39 PM, Lance Andersen - Oracle wrote:
Hi Deven,
I will address the needed updates a bit later.
Thank you for your input
Best
Lance
On Oct 29, 2012, at 3:51 AM, Deven You wrote:
Hi
implementation.
Thanks a lot!
On 09/21/2012 04:37 PM, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 21/09/2012 04:21, Deven You wrote:
Hi Lance,
I am very busy with other work so I can't work with the
SerialBlob/SerialClob item for long time. I am very happy to refine
the current test case and create new tests for SerialClob
at
that time.
If you would like to change your test and then create similar tests
for SerialClob I will add those as part of the put-back.
Again, thank you for your input and time.
Best
Lance
On Jul 5, 2012, at 2:26 AM, Deven You wrote:
Hi Lance,
Did you review the patch and compare
,
Thanks for the email and the proposed patch. I will look at this
later today or tomorrow. I actually have made these changes in my
workspace for JDK 8 but will compare your changes to mine.
Best
Lance
On Jul 2, 2012, at 5:04 AM, Deven You wrote:
Hi All,
Could anyone notice this problem
Hi All,
Could anyone notice this problem?
Thanks a lot!
On 06/25/2012 04:18 PM, Deven You wrote:
Hi All,
First of all, if the jdbc problem has a better mailing list to post
please tell me.
I find that javax.sql.rowset.serial.SerialBlob is not fully
implemented in OpenJDK 8. Methods
Hi All,
First of all, if the jdbc problem has a better mailing list to post
please tell me.
I find that javax.sql.rowset.serial.SerialBlob is not fully implemented
in OpenJDK 8. Methods
public InputStream getBinaryStream(long pos,long length) throws
SQLException
public void
Hi Alan,
Thanks for your reminder, I was going to point that this a manual test
case and need someone guide me how to configure it as manual with jtreg.
But I missed it by chance.
So Masayoshi or someone else, I'd very appreciate if you could guide me
how to configure a test case as manual
Hi Dmitry,
I have verified the change set. Thanks for your commit!
On 05/17/2012 03:44 PM, Dmitry Samersoff wrote:
Deven,
The fix is submitted to openjdk tl workspace
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/df33f5f750ec
-Dmitry
On 2012-04-26 05:21, Deven You wrote:
Hi Dmitry
Hi All,
There is a potential problem in
jdk/src/share/native/com/sun/java/util/jar/pack/jni.cpp.
(Maybe it is not suitable for posting this on core-lib, anyone could
tell me which mailing list is prefer?)
L85:
JNI_GetCreatedJavaVMs(vm, 1, null) in which the 3rd parameter is a
pointer to
,
the changes looks good for me.
I'll take care of the rest.
We have one more place in Agent.java executing exactly the same code
so I'll change both of them on your behalf.
-Dmitry
On 2012-04-23 11:43, Deven You wrote:
Thanks David,
So is it ok for you to contribute this patch?
On 04/23/2012
to it.
Sorry about that.
David
-
On 23/04/2012 4:30 PM, David Holmes wrote:
Deven,
On 23/04/2012 3:54 PM, Deven You wrote:
On 04/18/2012 02:20 PM, Deven You wrote:
On 04/18/2012 01:34 PM, Mandy Chung wrote:
I think this could still run into CME. System Properties is not a
synchronized map
On 04/18/2012 02:20 PM, Deven You wrote:
On 04/18/2012 01:34 PM, Mandy Chung wrote:
On 4/17/2012 12:33 AM, Deven You wrote:
I think this could still run into CME. System Properties is not a
synchronized map and the setter methods (System.setProperty or
Properties.put method) doesn't
On 04/18/2012 01:34 PM, Mandy Chung wrote:
On 4/17/2012 12:33 AM, Deven You wrote:
I think this could still run into CME. System Properties is not a
synchronized map and the setter methods (System.setProperty or
Properties.put method) doesn't synchronize on the Properties object.
Hi
On 04/12/2012 10:09 AM, Mandy Chung wrote:
On 4/11/2012 12:36 AM, Deven You wrote:
Hi core-libs-devs,
I am not sure if sun.management.Agent belongs to jmx-dev mailing
list, if so please anyone tell me.
serviceability-dev (cc'ed) is the mailing list for this patch.
This issue
I have verified this commit. Thanks Alan and Charles!
On 04/12/2012 03:12 PM, Charles Lee wrote:
On 04/11/2012 03:44 PM, Deven You wrote:
On 04/10/2012 04:12 PM, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 09/04/2012 10:32, Deven You wrote:
:
The issue is reported by one of our test team which maintains
.
On 04/12/2012 04:26 PM, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 12/04/2012 08:22, Deven You wrote:
I have verified this commit. Thanks Alan and Charles!
The change-set that Charles pushed added test/sun/tools/classpath/
RMICClassPathTest.java but I didn't see it in the original webrev. I
see now that your
Hi core-libs-devs,
I am not sure if sun.management.Agent belongs to jmx-dev mailing list,
if so please anyone tell me.
This issue is that the sun.management.Agent.loadManagementProperties()
will invoke properties.putAll which will throw
ConcurrentModifcationException if there are other
On 04/10/2012 04:12 PM, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 09/04/2012 10:32, Deven You wrote:
:
The issue is reported by one of our test team which maintains a set
of ORB test cases.
Okay but I guess I'm still a bit curious as it's not obvious that rmic
(or rmic --iiop) invokes toString, maybe
Hi core-libs-devs,
There are 2 sun bugs related to this issue:
http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do;jsessionid=663548580556ae43f50bf92c75b5?bug_id=6695325^and
http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do;jsessionid=663548580556ae43f50bf92c75b5?bug_id=6610897^
The basic problem is that the new
On 04/09/2012 05:03 PM, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 09/04/2012 08:01, Deven You wrote:
Hi core-libs-devs,
There are 2 sun bugs related to this issue:
http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do;jsessionid=663548580556ae43f50bf92c75b5?bug_id=6695325^and
http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do;jsessionid
33 matches
Mail list logo
