On 6 Jan 2014, at 21:19, Martin Buchholz marti...@google.com wrote:
Your change looks good, except there's one more trailing p to remove.
Thanks for the review. I found the trailing p and removed it.
-Chris.
On 6 Jan 2014, at 17:25, Martin Buchholz marti...@google.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 9:19 AM, Mike Duigou mike.dui...@oracle.com wrote:
If you navigate through
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~chegar/8031142/specdiff/java/util/package-summary.html
it shows just the relevant diffs. It
On 6 Jan 2014, at 17:05, Martin Buchholz marti...@google.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 8:47 AM, Chris Hegarty chris.hega...@oracle.com
wrote:
Part 2...
JDK 9 RFR - 8031142: AbstractCollection and AbstractList should specify their
default implementation using @implSpec
If you navigate through
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~chegar/8031142/specdiff/java/util/package-summary.html
it shows just the relevant diffs. It appears that the specdiff was generated
without an explicit --includes option which results in all the extra chaff.
Mike
On Jan 6 2014, at 09:05 ,
Part 2...
JDK 9 RFR - 8031142: AbstractCollection and AbstractList should specify
their default implementation using @implSpec
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~chegar/8031142/webrev/
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~chegar/8031142/specdiff/
-Chris.
On 06/01/14 15:37, Mike Duigou wrote:
Coming in
On 6 Jan 2014, at 18:11, Chris Hegarty chris.hega...@oracle.com wrote:
On 6 Jan 2014, at 17:05, Martin Buchholz marti...@google.com wrote:
……..
In a sane language, the AbstractFoo classes would be traits - they should
never contribute to the *specification* of a concrete class, only to
