Hello,
Could you please review the fix for the following bug:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8038795
Webrev corresponding:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~yan/8038795/webrev.00/
Just a minor cleanup of javadoc to avoid tidy warnings; no other code
affected.
Thanks.
Regards,
Alexander
I think you are looking for jmx-dev so forwarding to that list.
On 01/04/2014 13:51, alexander stepanov wrote:
Hello,
Could you please review the fix for the following bug:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8038795
Webrev corresponding:
Thanks!
On 01.04.2014 16:57, Alan Bateman wrote:
I think you are looking for jmx-dev so forwarding to that list.
On 01/04/2014 13:51, alexander stepanov wrote:
Hello,
Could you please review the fix for the following bug:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8038795
Webrev
On 01/04/2014 14:31, alexander stepanov wrote:
Thanks!
I should have said that the changes look okay to me. I just assume the
removal of the /p isn't really necessary.
-Alan.
Hi Alexander,
Looks good.
I think I would remove the leading p in
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~yan/8038795/webrev.00/src/share/classes/javax/management/remote/JMXPrincipal.java.frames.html
as well. If you don't please check that the generated javadoc for
JMXPrincipal.java still looks good.
On 4/1/14 4:41 PM, alexander stepanov wrote:
Hello,
Please see the updated webrev here:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~yan/8038795/webrev.01/
Thanks Alexander,
It looks good!
-- daniel
I just assume the removal of the /p isn't really necessary.
Yes, probably. That was done just to make
