On 6 Jan 2014, at 21:19, Martin Buchholz wrote:
> Your change looks good, except there's one more trailing to remove.
Thanks for the review. I found the trailing and removed it.
-Chris.
On 6 Jan 2014, at 18:11, Chris Hegarty wrote:
> On 6 Jan 2014, at 17:05, Martin Buchholz wrote:
> ……..
>>
>> In a sane language, the AbstractFoo classes would be traits - they should
>> never contribute to the *specification* of a concrete class, only to its
>> implementation. Therefore, i
Part 2...
JDK 9 RFR - 8031142: AbstractCollection and AbstractList should specify
their default implementation using @implSpec
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~chegar/8031142/webrev/
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~chegar/8031142/specdiff/
-Chris.
On 06/01/14 15:37, Mike Duigou wrote:
Coming in late
If you navigate through
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~chegar/8031142/specdiff/java/util/package-summary.html
it shows just the relevant diffs. It appears that the specdiff was generated
without an explicit --includes option which results in all the extra chaff.
Mike
On Jan 6 2014, at 09:05 , Mar
On 6 Jan 2014, at 17:05, Martin Buchholz wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 8:47 AM, Chris Hegarty
> wrote:
> Part 2...
>
> JDK 9 RFR - 8031142: AbstractCollection and AbstractList should specify their
> default implementation using @implSpec
>
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~chegar/8031142/webre
On 6 Jan 2014, at 17:25, Martin Buchholz wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 9:19 AM, Mike Duigou wrote:
> If you navigate through
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~chegar/8031142/specdiff/java/util/package-summary.html
> it shows just the relevant diffs. It appears that the specdiff was generated
