Hi Remi,
Chasing this up. I have not joined the dark-side just yet... but can you log an
issue for this?
Thanks,
Paul.
On Apr 20, 2015, at 4:27 PM, Remi Forax fo...@univ-mlv.fr wrote:
On 04/20/2015 01:39 PM, Paul Sandoz wrote:
Hi Remi,
I was gonna propose the same trick you mentioned
Hi Remi,
I was gonna propose the same trick you mentioned in your last email :-)
Similar tricks are possible for other cases like an equivalent of the recently
added ifPresentOrElse, but that was considered a little obtuse.
On Apr 17, 2015, at 11:37 PM, Remi Forax fo...@univ-mlv.fr wrote:
On 04/20/2015 01:39 PM, Paul Sandoz wrote:
Hi Remi,
I was gonna propose the same trick you mentioned in your last email :-)
yes, it's the same as
optional.map(Stream::of).orElseGet(() - Stream.empty())
(I use orElseGet() because Stream.empty() is not a constant !).
Similar tricks are
On 04/18/2015 01:58 AM, Andreas Lundblad wrote:
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 03:01:29PM -0700, Steven Schlansker wrote:
On Apr 17, 2015, at 2:37 PM, Remi Forax fo...@univ-mlv.fr wrote:
As you can see the code is not bad but the code of chain() could be simplified
if there was a way on Optional to
Hi guys,
I was trying to write a code that uses Optional and I think one method
is missing.
Let suppose I want to load a type (like a class, an interface, etc) that
can come
either by reflection, or by using ASM.
I will write an interface TypeProvider that is able to load a Type and
i will
On Apr 17, 2015, at 2:37 PM, Remi Forax fo...@univ-mlv.fr wrote:
As you can see the code is not bad but the code of chain() could be simplified
if there was a way on Optional to call a Supplier of Optional if an Optional
is empty.
Currently, orElse() takes a value, orElseGet takes a lambda
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 03:01:29PM -0700, Steven Schlansker wrote:
On Apr 17, 2015, at 2:37 PM, Remi Forax fo...@univ-mlv.fr wrote:
As you can see the code is not bad but the code of chain() could be
simplified
if there was a way on Optional to call a Supplier of Optional if an
