Hi Folks,
We are facing issue with process builder on JRockit JVM with solaris
5.10 machine. That is realted to following bug:
http://bugs.java.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=5049299
Currently we are using JRockit JDK 1.6.0_37-R28.2.5-4.1.0 version.
Please let me know following :
*
On 08/11/2013 00:39, David Holmes wrote:
And linux? It has changed to vfork right?
So OSX has changed, linux has changed, but Solaris remains as-is. All
platforms allow selecting the mechanism via the property
jdk.lang.Process.launchMechanism
The only change is OSX where the default
vfork was the default in Linux before 5049299. You can see the variable
START_CHILD_USE_VFORK being set in:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~robm/5049299/webrev.06/src/solaris/native/java/lang/UNIXProcess_md.c.cdiff.html
-Rob
On 08/11/13 00:39, David Holmes wrote:
On 7/11/2013 11:53 PM, Rob
Ah, thanks for catching that David, I've updated the webrev in place.
I believe the reasoning is that we want to minimise any potential impact
to customers running in production. The general feeling seems to be that
Mac is a development platform and is less likely to cause us problems in
that
I've added a review showing the differences to jdk8 to:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~robm/5049299/7/webrev.02/
I've updated the previous webrev (
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~robm/5049299/7/webrev.01/ ) in place to
reflect the comment change.
Note: still putting together a separate test which
On 07/11/2013 13:52, Rob McKenna wrote:
I've added a review showing the differences to jdk8 to:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~robm/5049299/7/webrev.02/
That makes it easy, thanks. At L100 then I assume you mean posix_spawn
rather than spawn.
-Alan
On 7/11/2013 11:53 PM, Rob McKenna wrote:
Ah, thanks for catching that David, I've updated the webrev in place.
I believe the reasoning is that we want to minimise any potential impact
to customers running in production. The general feeling seems to be that
Mac is a development platform and is
Hi Alan,
On 06/11/13 09:05, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 05/11/2013 21:37, Rob McKenna wrote:
Apologies, I forgot to mention the dependency on:
8008118: (process) Possible null pointer dereference in
jdk/src/solaris/native/java/lang/UNIXProcess_md.c
Hi David,
The only difference in 5049299 is the change in the default property
value in Solaris. Apologies for not making that clear.
-Rob
On 06/11/13 01:09, David Holmes wrote:
Hi Rob,
How different is this to the JDK 8 version?
Thanks,
David
On 6/11/2013 7:24 AM, Rob McKenna wrote:
On 06/11/2013 13:30, Rob McKenna wrote:
Yes, absolutely. I'm looking for approval for the code in principle.
Particularly the change in the default property value on Solaris since
thats the only change. Once approved I will of course seek approval
for integration.
I think the proposal is
On 05/11/2013 21:37, Rob McKenna wrote:
Apologies, I forgot to mention the dependency on:
8008118: (process) Possible null pointer dereference in
jdk/src/solaris/native/java/lang/UNIXProcess_md.c
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/jdk8/jdk/rev/0111bab8dc35
-Rob
To keep the changes the same
On 6/11/2013 10:00 PM, Rob McKenna wrote:
Hi David,
The only difference in 5049299 is the change in the default property
value in Solaris. Apologies for not making that clear.
Given this was primarily aimed at Solaris in the first place it seems
strange to me to not make the change on
Hi folks,
I'd like to backport this change to JDK7. Note: this fix uses
posix_spawn by default on Mac OSX only. On Solaris fork will remain the
default behaviour.
I've just noticed that there is a problem with the testcase on Solaris
in that it will test fork twice. (and won't test
..
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~robm/5049299/7/webrev.01/
-Rob
On 05/11/13 21:23, Rob McKenna wrote:
Hi folks,
I'd like to backport this change to JDK7. Note: this fix uses
posix_spawn by default on Mac OSX only. On Solaris fork will remain
the default behaviour.
I've just noticed
Apologies, I forgot to mention the dependency on:
8008118: (process) Possible null pointer dereference in
jdk/src/solaris/native/java/lang/UNIXProcess_md.c
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/jdk8/jdk/rev/0111bab8dc35
-Rob
On 05/11/13 21:24, Rob McKenna wrote:
..
Hi Rob,
How different is this to the JDK 8 version?
Thanks,
David
On 6/11/2013 7:24 AM, Rob McKenna wrote:
..
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~robm/5049299/7/webrev.01/
-Rob
On 05/11/13 21:23, Rob McKenna wrote:
Hi folks,
I'd like to backport this change to JDK7. Note: this fix uses
16 matches
Mail list logo
