> De: "John Rose"
> À: "Remi Forax"
> Cc: "Peter Levart" , "Rémi Forax"
> , "core-libs-dev"
> Envoyé: Vendredi 4 Juin 2021 02:05:41
> Objet: Re: [External] : Re: RFR: 8199318: add idempotent copy operation for
> Map.Entry
m>>,
"Rémi Forax" mailto:fo...@openjdk.java.net>>,
"core-libs-dev"
mailto:core-libs-dev@openjdk.java.net>>
Envoyé: Jeudi 3 Juin 2021 22:51:28
Objet: Re: RFR: 8199318: add idempotent copy operation for Map.Entry
...
interface ComparableRecord>
exte
> De: "John Rose"
> À: "Remi Forax" < fo...@univ-mlv.fr >
> Cc: "Peter Levart" < peter.lev...@gmail.com >, "Rémi Forax" <
> fo...@openjdk.java.net >, "core-libs-dev" < core-libs-dev@openjdk.java.net >
> En
> De: "John Rose"
> À: "Remi Forax"
> Cc: "Peter Levart" , "Rémi Forax"
> , "core-libs-dev"
> Envoyé: Jeudi 3 Juin 2021 22:51:28
> Objet: Re: RFR: 8199318: add idempotent copy operation for Map.Entry
> On Jun 3, 2021, at
On Jun 3, 2021, at 12:46 PM, Remi Forax
mailto:fo...@univ-mlv.fr>> wrote:
I kind of regret that the compiler does not provide automatically an
implementation of compareTo if the record implements Comparable.
People sucks at writing compareTo and the resulting bugs are hard to
find/reproduce.
T
- Mail original -
> De: "Peter Levart"
> À: "Rémi Forax" , "core-libs-dev"
>
> Envoyé: Jeudi 3 Juin 2021 20:49:05
> Objet: Re: RFR: 8199318: add idempotent copy operation for Map.Entry
> On 02/06/2021 19:24, Rémi Forax wrote:
>> I f
On 02/06/2021 19:24, Rémi Forax wrote:
I foolishly hoped that nobody would subclass a class with `Immutable` in its
name,
oh boy i was wrong:)
There's nothing wrong in subclassing an immutable class. As long as the
subclass keeps being immutable. Was it subclassed and made mutable by that?
On Wed, 2 Jun 2021 17:54:06 GMT, Stuart Marks wrote:
>> I'm fixing this along with a couple intertwined issues.
>>
>> 1. Add Map.Entry::copyOf as an idempotent copy operation.
>>
>> 2. Clarify that AbstractMap.SimpleImmutableEntry is itself unmodifiable (not
>> really immutable) but that subcl
On Wed, 2 Jun 2021 18:07:55 GMT, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
>> Stuart Marks has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Tiny editorial tweaks.
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/Map.java line 396:
>
>> 394:
>> 395: /**
>> 396:
On Wed, 2 Jun 2021 17:54:06 GMT, Stuart Marks wrote:
>> I'm fixing this along with a couple intertwined issues.
>>
>> 1. Add Map.Entry::copyOf as an idempotent copy operation.
>>
>> 2. Clarify that AbstractMap.SimpleImmutableEntry is itself unmodifiable (not
>> really immutable) but that subcl
On Wed, 2 Jun 2021 17:54:06 GMT, Stuart Marks wrote:
>> I'm fixing this along with a couple intertwined issues.
>>
>> 1. Add Map.Entry::copyOf as an idempotent copy operation.
>>
>> 2. Clarify that AbstractMap.SimpleImmutableEntry is itself unmodifiable (not
>> really immutable) but that subcl
> I'm fixing this along with a couple intertwined issues.
>
> 1. Add Map.Entry::copyOf as an idempotent copy operation.
>
> 2. Clarify that AbstractMap.SimpleImmutableEntry is itself unmodifiable (not
> really immutable) but that subclasses can be modifiable.
>
> 3. Clarify some confusing, hist
On Wed, 2 Jun 2021 17:12:21 GMT, Stuart Marks wrote:
> A quick search reveals that Guava has a public subclass of
> SimpleImmutableEntry:
> https://guava.dev/releases/30.1.1-jre/api/docs/com/google/common/cache/RemovalNotification.html
>There are possibly others. It doesn't seem worth the incom
On Wed, 2 Jun 2021 07:35:25 GMT, Rémi Forax wrote:
> i wonder if we should not declare SimpleImmutableEntry final, while it's not
> a backward compatible change,
> it's may be better on the long term because SimpleImmutableEntry is already
> used as an immutable type,
> so instead of documentin
On Wed, 2 Jun 2021 00:39:25 GMT, Stuart Marks wrote:
> I'm fixing this along with a couple intertwined issues.
>
> 1. Add Map.Entry::copyOf as an idempotent copy operation.
>
> 2. Clarify that AbstractMap.SimpleImmutableEntry is itself unmodifiable (not
> really immutable) but that subclasses
On Wed, 2 Jun 2021 00:39:25 GMT, Stuart Marks wrote:
> I'm fixing this along with a couple intertwined issues.
>
> 1. Add Map.Entry::copyOf as an idempotent copy operation.
>
> 2. Clarify that AbstractMap.SimpleImmutableEntry is itself unmodifiable (not
> really immutable) but that subclasses
I'm fixing this along with a couple intertwined issues.
1. Add Map.Entry::copyOf as an idempotent copy operation.
2. Clarify that AbstractMap.SimpleImmutableEntry is itself unmodifiable (not
really immutable) but that subclasses can be modifiable.
3. Clarify some confusing, historical wording a
17 matches
Mail list logo
