Re: RFR: 8253497: Core Libs Terminology Refresh [v3]

2020-12-15 Thread Brent Christian
On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 22:13:58 GMT, Stuart Marks wrote: >> It's an adverb, since it's the act of 'defining' that is being done too >> restrictively or broadly. If you want to have an adjective you would need to >> rephrase it so it applies to the noun, like 'defining a too restrictive >>

Re: RFR: 8253497: Core Libs Terminology Refresh [v3]

2020-12-15 Thread Roger Riggs
On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 22:21:12 GMT, Brent Christian wrote: >> This is part of an effort in the JDK to replace archaic/non-inclusive words >> with more neutral terms (see JDK-8253315 for details). >> >> Here are the changes covering core libraries code and tests. Terms were >> changed as

Re: RFR: 8253497: Core Libs Terminology Refresh [v3]

2020-12-15 Thread Brian Burkhalter
On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 22:21:12 GMT, Brent Christian wrote: >> This is part of an effort in the JDK to replace archaic/non-inclusive words >> with more neutral terms (see JDK-8253315 for details). >> >> Here are the changes covering core libraries code and tests. Terms were >> changed as

Re: RFR: 8253497: Core Libs Terminology Refresh [v3]

2020-12-15 Thread Brent Christian
> This is part of an effort in the JDK to replace archaic/non-inclusive words > with more neutral terms (see JDK-8253315 for details). > > Here are the changes covering core libraries code and tests. Terms were > changed as follows: > 1. grandfathered -> legacy > 2. blacklist -> filter or