On Fri, 4 Jun 2021 15:10:18 GMT, Nick Gasson wrote:
>> macOS on Apple silicon uses slightly different ABI conventions to the
>> standard AArch64 ABI. The differences are outlined in [1]. In
>> particular in the standard (AAPCS) ABI, variadic arguments may be passed
>> in either registers or on
On Fri, 4 Jun 2021 11:07:27 GMT, Jorn Vernee wrote:
>> test/jdk/java/foreign/valist/VaListTest.java line 706:
>>
>>> 704: vaList.skip(BigPoint_LAYOUT);
>>> 705: assertEquals((long) vaList.vargAsLong(C_LONG), 42);
>>> 706: })},
>>
>> Looks
On Fri, 4 Jun 2021 12:57:17 GMT, Maurizio Cimadamore
wrote:
>
> That fix has a switch on the ABI type in the SystemLookup class (a new class
> introduced by that fix). I believe that switch will no longer compile with
> the changes in this PR as the ABI enum constants have changed -
> macOS on Apple silicon uses slightly different ABI conventions to the
> standard AArch64 ABI. The differences are outlined in [1]. In
> particular in the standard (AAPCS) ABI, variadic arguments may be passed
> in either registers or on the stack following the normal calling
> convention. To
On Fri, 4 Jun 2021 10:06:26 GMT, Nick Gasson wrote:
>> The JEP has been integrated, so we can pick this back up (and handle it as a
>> bug for 17 even after the fork).
>>
>> Thank you for your patience.
>
> Thanks @JornVernee! I noticed VaListTest has started failing on Windows with
> this
> macOS on Apple silicon uses slightly different ABI conventions to the
> standard AArch64 ABI. The differences are outlined in [1]. In
> particular in the standard (AAPCS) ABI, variadic arguments may be passed
> in either registers or on the stack following the normal calling
> convention. To
> macOS on Apple silicon uses slightly different ABI conventions to the
> standard AArch64 ABI. The differences are outlined in [1]. In
> particular in the standard (AAPCS) ABI, variadic arguments may be passed
> in either registers or on the stack following the normal calling
> convention. To
On Thu, 3 Jun 2021 03:28:56 GMT, Nick Gasson wrote:
>> macOS on Apple silicon uses slightly different ABI conventions to the
>> standard AArch64 ABI. The differences are outlined in [1]. In
>> particular in the standard (AAPCS) ABI, variadic arguments may be passed
>> in either registers or on
On Fri, 4 Jun 2021 11:04:33 GMT, Jorn Vernee wrote:
>> Nick Gasson has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> No variadic upcalls
>>
>> Change-Id: Ibf91c570c88be2587e9e23240477c4a5cc56b4c5
>> CustomizedGitHooks: yes
>
>
On Thu, 3 Jun 2021 03:28:56 GMT, Nick Gasson wrote:
>> macOS on Apple silicon uses slightly different ABI conventions to the
>> standard AArch64 ABI. The differences are outlined in [1]. In
>> particular in the standard (AAPCS) ABI, variadic arguments may be passed
>> in either registers or on
On Fri, 4 Jun 2021 10:06:26 GMT, Nick Gasson wrote:
>> The JEP has been integrated, so we can pick this back up (and handle it as a
>> bug for 17 even after the fork).
>>
>> Thank you for your patience.
>
> Thanks @JornVernee! I noticed VaListTest has started failing on Windows with
> this
On Wed, 2 Jun 2021 13:42:22 GMT, Jorn Vernee wrote:
>> macOS on Apple silicon uses slightly different ABI conventions to the
>> standard AArch64 ABI. The differences are outlined in [1]. In
>> particular in the standard (AAPCS) ABI, variadic arguments may be passed
>> in either registers or on
On Thu, 3 Jun 2021 03:28:56 GMT, Nick Gasson wrote:
>> macOS on Apple silicon uses slightly different ABI conventions to the
>> standard AArch64 ABI. The differences are outlined in [1]. In
>> particular in the standard (AAPCS) ABI, variadic arguments may be passed
>> in either registers or on
On Thu, 3 Jun 2021 03:09:58 GMT, Nick Gasson wrote:
>> macOS on Apple silicon uses slightly different ABI conventions to the
>> standard AArch64 ABI. The differences are outlined in [1]. In
>> particular in the standard (AAPCS) ABI, variadic arguments may be passed
>> in either registers or on
> macOS on Apple silicon uses slightly different ABI conventions to the
> standard AArch64 ABI. The differences are outlined in [1]. In
> particular in the standard (AAPCS) ABI, variadic arguments may be passed
> in either registers or on the stack following the normal calling
> convention. To
> macOS on Apple silicon uses slightly different ABI conventions to the
> standard AArch64 ABI. The differences are outlined in [1]. In
> particular in the standard (AAPCS) ABI, variadic arguments may be passed
> in either registers or on the stack following the normal calling
> convention. To
On Thu, 22 Apr 2021 08:19:53 GMT, Nick Gasson wrote:
> macOS on Apple silicon uses slightly different ABI conventions to the
> standard AArch64 ABI. The differences are outlined in [1]. In
> particular in the standard (AAPCS) ABI, variadic arguments may be passed
> in either registers or on
On Mon, 3 May 2021 15:37:44 GMT, Jorn Vernee wrote:
>> src/jdk.incubator.foreign/share/classes/jdk/internal/foreign/abi/aarch64/macos/StackVaList.java
>> line 131:
>>
>>> 129: MemorySegment struct = allocator.allocate(layout);
>>> 130:
On Mon, 26 Apr 2021 12:52:54 GMT, Jorn Vernee wrote:
>> macOS on Apple silicon uses slightly different ABI conventions to the
>> standard AArch64 ABI. The differences are outlined in [1]. In
>> particular in the standard (AAPCS) ABI, variadic arguments may be passed
>> in either registers or
On Mon, 26 Apr 2021 14:30:17 GMT, Maurizio Cimadamore
wrote:
>> macOS on Apple silicon uses slightly different ABI conventions to the
>> standard AArch64 ABI. The differences are outlined in [1]. In
>> particular in the standard (AAPCS) ABI, variadic arguments may be passed
>> in either
On Mon, 3 May 2021 15:31:53 GMT, Jorn Vernee wrote:
>> macOS on Apple silicon uses slightly different ABI conventions to the
>> standard AArch64 ABI. The differences are outlined in [1]. In
>> particular in the standard (AAPCS) ABI, variadic arguments may be passed
>> in either registers or on
On Thu, 22 Apr 2021 08:19:53 GMT, Nick Gasson wrote:
> macOS on Apple silicon uses slightly different ABI conventions to the
> standard AArch64 ABI. The differences are outlined in [1]. In
> particular in the standard (AAPCS) ABI, variadic arguments may be passed
> in either registers or on
On Tue, 27 Apr 2021 02:14:07 GMT, Nick Gasson wrote:
>> How about StandardAArch64Linker? Otherwise MacOsAArch64Linker sounds like it
>> should be a specialisation of AArch64Linker.
>
> Or LinuxAArch64Linker if we're going to rename the CABI enum AArch64 ->
> LinuxAArch64? But this would also
On Mon, 26 Apr 2021 14:27:49 GMT, Maurizio Cimadamore
wrote:
>> macOS on Apple silicon uses slightly different ABI conventions to the
>> standard AArch64 ABI. The differences are outlined in [1]. In
>> particular in the standard (AAPCS) ABI, variadic arguments may be passed
>> in either
On Tue, 27 Apr 2021 02:07:50 GMT, Nick Gasson wrote:
>> src/jdk.incubator.foreign/share/classes/jdk/internal/foreign/abi/aarch64/aapcs/AapcsLinker.java
>> line 50:
>>
>>> 48: * the ARM 64-bit Architecture".
>>> 49: */
>>> 50: public class AapcsLinker implements CLinker {
>>
>> I see why
On Mon, 26 Apr 2021 14:29:43 GMT, Maurizio Cimadamore
wrote:
>> macOS on Apple silicon uses slightly different ABI conventions to the
>> standard AArch64 ABI. The differences are outlined in [1]. In
>> particular in the standard (AAPCS) ABI, variadic arguments may be passed
>> in either
On Thu, 22 Apr 2021 08:19:53 GMT, Nick Gasson wrote:
> macOS on Apple silicon uses slightly different ABI conventions to the
> standard AArch64 ABI. The differences are outlined in [1]. In
> particular in the standard (AAPCS) ABI, variadic arguments may be passed
> in either registers or on
On Thu, 22 Apr 2021 08:19:53 GMT, Nick Gasson wrote:
> macOS on Apple silicon uses slightly different ABI conventions to the
> standard AArch64 ABI. The differences are outlined in [1]. In
> particular in the standard (AAPCS) ABI, variadic arguments may be passed
> in either registers or on
On Thu, 22 Apr 2021 08:19:53 GMT, Nick Gasson wrote:
> macOS on Apple silicon uses slightly different ABI conventions to the
> standard AArch64 ABI. The differences are outlined in [1]. In
> particular in the standard (AAPCS) ABI, variadic arguments may be passed
> in either registers or on
macOS on Apple silicon uses slightly different ABI conventions to the
standard AArch64 ABI. The differences are outlined in [1]. In
particular in the standard (AAPCS) ABI, variadic arguments may be passed
in either registers or on the stack following the normal calling
convention. To handle
30 matches
Mail list logo
