Re: RFR: 8268250: Class.arrayType() for a 255-d array throws undocumented IllegalArgumentException [v3]

2022-02-16 Thread Joe Darcy
On Thu, 17 Feb 2022 03:05:36 GMT, Athijegannathan Sundararajan wrote: >> Joe Darcy has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge >> or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought >> in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains six

Re: RFR: 8268250: Class.arrayType() for a 255-d array throws undocumented IllegalArgumentException [v3]

2022-02-16 Thread Joe Darcy
On Thu, 17 Feb 2022 02:56:53 GMT, Joe Darcy wrote: >> Make explicit illegal argument cases of Class.arrayType. >> >> Please also review the corresponding CSR: >> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8268300 > > Joe Darcy has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge >

Re: RFR: 8268250: Class.arrayType() for a 255-d array throws undocumented IllegalArgumentException [v3]

2022-02-16 Thread Athijegannathan Sundararajan
On Thu, 17 Feb 2022 02:56:53 GMT, Joe Darcy wrote: >> Make explicit illegal argument cases of Class.arrayType. >> >> Please also review the corresponding CSR: >> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8268300 > > Joe Darcy has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge >

Re: RFR: 8268250: Class.arrayType() for a 255-d array throws undocumented IllegalArgumentException [v3]

2022-02-16 Thread Athijegannathan Sundararajan
On Thu, 17 Feb 2022 02:56:53 GMT, Joe Darcy wrote: >> Make explicit illegal argument cases of Class.arrayType. >> >> Please also review the corresponding CSR: >> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8268300 > > Joe Darcy has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge >

Re: RFR: 8268250: Class.arrayType() for a 255-d array throws undocumented IllegalArgumentException [v3]

2022-02-16 Thread Joe Darcy
> Make explicit illegal argument cases of Class.arrayType. > > Please also review the corresponding CSR: > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8268300 Joe Darcy has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated