On Sun, 24 Oct 2021 16:45:15 GMT, Phil Race wrote:
> This makes the tests eligible to be run on headful systems. In practice it
> seems like ONLY headful systems actually have the sound devices. The sound
> keyword isn't understood by anything yet, so adding headful is the only way
> we have
On Fri, 22 Oct 2021 19:01:27 GMT, Phil Race wrote:
> This fix adds "headful sound" keywords to a number of javax/sound jtreg tests
>
> The jtreg javax.sound tests are written in such a way that if a needed audio
> device
> or other platform resource is not available, they just exit with a
On Fri, 22 Oct 2021 19:01:27 GMT, Phil Race wrote:
> This fix adds "headful sound" keywords to a number of javax/sound jtreg tests
>
> The jtreg javax.sound tests are written in such a way that if a needed audio
> device
> or other platform resource is not available, they just exit with a
This fix adds "headful sound" keywords to a number of javax/sound jtreg tests
The jtreg javax.sound tests are written in such a way that if a needed audio
device
or other platform resource is not available, they just exit with a "pass" for
the test.
It is as if headful tests just swallowed
