On Wed, 2 Mar 2022 14:06:10 GMT, Claes Redestad wrote:
>> Claes Redestad has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
>> merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains 29 commits:
>>
>> - Resolve merge conflict
>> - Fix TestCountPositives to correctly allow 0 return when
On Wed, 2 Mar 2022 14:06:10 GMT, Claes Redestad wrote:
>> Claes Redestad has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
>> merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains 29 commits:
>>
>> - Resolve merge conflict
>> - Fix TestCountPositives to correctly allow 0 return when
On Tue, 1 Mar 2022 19:12:17 GMT, Claes Redestad wrote:
> > @theRealAph , @a74nh or someone familiar with aarch64 code, please review
> > aarch64 changes.
>
> Note that the aarch64 changes I've put in for now implements `countPositives`
> to return `0` if there's a negative value anywhere,
On Wed, 23 Feb 2022 14:19:20 GMT, Claes Redestad wrote:
>> I'm requesting comments and, hopefully, some help with this patch to replace
>> `StringCoding.hasNegatives` with `countPositives`. The new method does a
>> very similar pass, but alters the intrinsic to return the number of leading
>>
On Tue, 1 Mar 2022 19:12:17 GMT, Claes Redestad wrote:
>> @theRealAph , @a74nh or someone familiar with aarch64 code, please review
>> aarch64 changes.
>
>> @theRealAph , @a74nh or someone familiar with aarch64 code, please review
>> aarch64 changes.
>
> Note that the aarch64 changes I've
On Tue, 1 Mar 2022 18:32:00 GMT, Vladimir Kozlov wrote:
> @theRealAph , @a74nh or someone familiar with aarch64 code, please review
> aarch64 changes.
Note that the aarch64 changes I've put in for now implements `countPositives`
to return `0` if there's a negative value anywhere, otherwise
On Wed, 23 Feb 2022 14:19:20 GMT, Claes Redestad wrote:
>> I'm requesting comments and, hopefully, some help with this patch to replace
>> `StringCoding.hasNegatives` with `countPositives`. The new method does a
>> very similar pass, but alters the intrinsic to return the number of leading
>>
On Wed, 23 Feb 2022 14:19:20 GMT, Claes Redestad wrote:
>> I'm requesting comments and, hopefully, some help with this patch to replace
>> `StringCoding.hasNegatives` with `countPositives`. The new method does a
>> very similar pass, but alters the intrinsic to return the number of leading
>>
> I'm requesting comments and, hopefully, some help with this patch to replace
> `StringCoding.hasNegatives` with `countPositives`. The new method does a very
> similar pass, but alters the intrinsic to return the number of leading bytes
> in the `byte[]` range which only has positive bytes.
