Re: RFR: 8281631: HashMap copy constructor and putAll can over-allocate table [v19]

2022-03-03 Thread XenoAmess
On Fri, 18 Feb 2022 18:32:31 GMT, Stuart Marks wrote: >> XenoAmess has updated the pull request incrementally with two additional >> commits since the last revision: >> >> - migrate to junit >> - change threshold > > Sigh. (I'm sighing at the author of the >

Re: RFR: 8281631: HashMap copy constructor and putAll can over-allocate table [v19]

2022-03-02 Thread XenoAmess
On Fri, 18 Feb 2022 18:32:31 GMT, Stuart Marks wrote: >> XenoAmess has updated the pull request incrementally with two additional >> commits since the last revision: >> >> - migrate to junit >> - change threshold > > Sigh. (I'm sighing at the author of the >

Re: RFR: 8281631: HashMap copy constructor and putAll can over-allocate table [v19]

2022-02-18 Thread XenoAmess
On Fri, 18 Feb 2022 18:32:31 GMT, Stuart Marks wrote: > Sigh. (I'm sighing at the author of the > Enum/ConstantDirectoryOptimalCapacity.java test, not you.) What a mess. See > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8282120 which I just filed. The > broken test and the OptimalCapacity

Re: RFR: 8281631: HashMap copy constructor and putAll can over-allocate table [v19]

2022-02-18 Thread Stuart Marks
On Fri, 18 Feb 2022 15:29:25 GMT, XenoAmess wrote: >> 8281631: HashMap copy constructor and putAll can over-allocate table > > XenoAmess has updated the pull request incrementally with two additional > commits since the last revision: > > - migrate to junit > - change threshold Sigh. (I'm

Re: RFR: 8281631: HashMap copy constructor and putAll can over-allocate table [v19]

2022-02-18 Thread XenoAmess
> 8281631: HashMap copy constructor and putAll can over-allocate table XenoAmess has updated the pull request incrementally with two additional commits since the last revision: - migrate to junit - change threshold - Changes: - all: