+1
—
Actually… even small API tweaks are not easy :-), this got me thinking whether
this method should explicitly state negate is called, since it has implications
for subtypes. Something to consider as a follow on tweak perhaps.
Paul.
> On May 29, 2018, at 5:52 AM, Jim Laskey wrote:
>
>
Hi Jim,
looks good.
Rémi
- Mail original -
> De: "Jim Laskey"
> À: "core-libs-dev"
> Envoyé: Mardi 29 Mai 2018 14:52:24
> Objet: RFR: JDK-8050818 Predicate::not - provide an easier way to negate a
> predicate
> Introduce a new static method Pred
On 2018-05-29 14:52, Jim Laskey wrote:
Introduce a new static method Predicate::not which will allow developers to
negate predicate lambdas trivially.
webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jlaskey/8050818/webrev/index.html
Implementation and test looks good to me.
Thanks!
/Claes
What about "not null" predicate? This is also very common. Right now it is
possible via `Objects::nonNull` but many people do not know about this
method. So, having a `Predicate.notNull` method would be nice.
2018-05-29 19:52 GMT+07:00 Jim Laskey :
> Introduce a new static method Predicate::not
Introduce a new static method Predicate::not which will allow developers to
negate predicate lambdas trivially.
webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jlaskey/8050818/webrev/index.html
bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8050818
csr: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8203428
