On 11/27/2013 08:40 AM, David Holmes wrote:
On 27/11/2013 2:16 AM, David Chase wrote:
On 2013-11-26, at 8:12 AM, David Chase david.r.ch...@oracle.com wrote:
On 2013-11-26, at 7:32 AM, David Holmes david.hol...@oracle.com
wrote:
On 26/11/2013 10:16 PM, David Chase wrote:
On 2013-11-26, at
On 11/27/2013 11:03 AM, David Holmes wrote:
Hi Peter,
On 27/11/2013 7:20 PM, Peter Levart wrote:
On 11/27/2013 08:40 AM, David Holmes wrote:
On 27/11/2013 2:16 AM, David Chase wrote:
On 2013-11-26, at 8:12 AM, David Chase david.r.ch...@oracle.com
wrote:
On 2013-11-26, at 7:32 AM, David
On 2013-11-27, at 6:53 AM, Peter Levart peter.lev...@gmail.com wrote:
Ah, I have misunderstood the back-porting issue. It was not about not having
new class but about which existing class to use as a host that might not
exist in older version of platform...
Sorry for noise.
Noise is
On 11/27/2013 02:40 PM, David Chase wrote:
On 2013-11-27, at 6:53 AM, Peter Levart peter.lev...@gmail.com wrote:
Ah, I have misunderstood the back-porting issue. It was not about not having
new class but about which existing class to use as a host that might not exist
in older version of
On 2013-11-25, at 9:18 PM, David Holmes david.hol...@oracle.com wrote:
We do have the jdk.internal namespace. But I think Unsafe is as good a place
as any - though maybe sun.misc.VM is marginally better?
Does anyone have any problems with sun.misc.VM as a choice?
I have to do a minor revision
On 26/11/2013 9:56 PM, David Chase wrote:
On 2013-11-25, at 9:18 PM, David Holmes david.hol...@oracle.com wrote:
We do have the jdk.internal namespace. But I think Unsafe is as good a place as
any - though maybe sun.misc.VM is marginally better?
Does anyone have any problems with
On 2013-11-26, at 7:12 AM, David Holmes david.hol...@oracle.com wrote:
On 26/11/2013 9:56 PM, David Chase wrote:
On 2013-11-25, at 9:18 PM, David Holmes david.hol...@oracle.com wrote:
We do have the jdk.internal namespace. But I think Unsafe is as good a
place as any - though maybe
On 26/11/2013 10:16 PM, David Chase wrote:
On 2013-11-26, at 7:12 AM, David Holmes david.hol...@oracle.com wrote:
On 26/11/2013 9:56 PM, David Chase wrote:
On 2013-11-25, at 9:18 PM, David Holmes david.hol...@oracle.com wrote:
We do have the jdk.internal namespace. But I think Unsafe is as
On 2013-11-26, at 7:32 AM, David Holmes david.hol...@oracle.com wrote:
On 26/11/2013 10:16 PM, David Chase wrote:
On 2013-11-26, at 7:12 AM, David Holmes david.hol...@oracle.com wrote:
On 26/11/2013 9:56 PM, David Chase wrote:
On 2013-11-25, at 9:18 PM, David Holmes
On 2013-11-26, at 8:12 AM, David Chase david.r.ch...@oracle.com wrote:
On 2013-11-26, at 7:32 AM, David Holmes david.hol...@oracle.com wrote:
On 26/11/2013 10:16 PM, David Chase wrote:
On 2013-11-26, at 7:12 AM, David Holmes david.hol...@oracle.com wrote:
On 26/11/2013 9:56 PM, David Chase
On Nov 22, 2013, at 11:07 AM, David Chase david.r.ch...@oracle.com wrote:
Webrev(s):
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~drchase/8016839/webrev-hotspot.01/
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~drchase/8016839/webrev-jdk.01/
Excellent work. Count me as reviewer, please. — John
On 27/11/2013 2:16 AM, David Chase wrote:
On 2013-11-26, at 8:12 AM, David Chase david.r.ch...@oracle.com wrote:
On 2013-11-26, at 7:32 AM, David Holmes david.hol...@oracle.com wrote:
On 26/11/2013 10:16 PM, David Chase wrote:
On 2013-11-26, at 7:12 AM, David Holmes
HI David,
Just curious: why did you chose to add the method, throwIllegalAccessError, to
s.m.Unsafe and add Unsafe to the list pre-loaded classes rather than modifying
an existing pre-loaded class?
Paul.
On Nov 25, 2013, at 1:49 AM, Paul Sandoz paul.san...@oracle.com wrote:
Just curious: why did you chose to add the method, throwIllegalAccessError,
to s.m.Unsafe and add Unsafe to the list pre-loaded classes rather than
modifying an existing pre-loaded class?
Unsafe is used everywhere,
On 26/11/2013 11:29 AM, John Rose wrote:
On Nov 25, 2013, at 1:49 AM, Paul Sandoz paul.san...@oracle.com wrote:
Just curious: why did you chose to add the method, throwIllegalAccessError, to
s.m.Unsafe and add Unsafe to the list pre-loaded classes rather than modifying
an existing pre-loaded
Updated request.
This is for a bug that it deferred by compilers,
but runtime really wants it fixed because they
are working in the same area and don't like it at all.
In particular, they want it committed to hotspot-rt ASAP
(don't want to wait for the multiweek turnaround)
and thus the diffs and
David,
Thank you so much for finding a way to do this. We do think this is important
to get in for 8.
And thank you for a way to check the hotspot changes in without waiting for the
jdk changes.
Code looks good.
Couple of minor comments:
1. universe.cpp - when the hotspot change gets in and
On 2013-11-22, at 2:56 PM, Karen Kinnear karen.kinn...@oracle.com wrote:
David,
Thank you so much for finding a way to do this. We do think this is important
to get in for 8.
And thank you for a way to check the hotspot changes in without waiting for
the jdk changes.
Code looks good.
18 matches
Mail list logo
