On 07/25/13 10:15, Doug Lea wrote:
On 07/24/13 19:30, Martin Buchholz wrote:
PriorityQueue is unusual in that Doug maintains a copy in jsr166 CVS even though
it is a non-thread-safe collection. I think it makes sense,
because PriorityQueue and PriorityBlockingQueue have parallel APIs and
On 07/24/13 19:30, Martin Buchholz wrote:
PriorityQueue is unusual in that Doug maintains a copy in jsr166 CVS even though
it is a non-thread-safe collection. I think it makes sense,
because PriorityQueue and PriorityBlockingQueue have parallel APIs and parallel
implementations. Many changes
Yes, and there should be. I will open an issue.
Mike
On Jul 23 2013, at 17:26 , Alan Bateman wrote:
On 22/07/2013 12:24, Mike Duigou wrote:
Hello all;
A simple rewiew for the addition of another constructor to PriorityQueue.
Currently if you wish to specify a Comparator you must also
On 22/07/2013 12:24, Mike Duigou wrote:
Hello all;
A simple rewiew for the addition of another constructor to PriorityQueue.
Currently if you wish to specify a Comparator you must also supply a size. This
addition allows use of the default size which is good for two reason; you don't
have to
Hello all;
A simple rewiew for the addition of another constructor to PriorityQueue.
Currently if you wish to specify a Comparator you must also supply a size. This
addition allows use of the default size which is good for two reason; you don't
have to specify a fixed value and the
looks fine Mike
Best
Lance
On Jul 22, 2013, at 3:24 PM, Mike Duigou wrote:
Hello all;
A simple rewiew for the addition of another constructor to PriorityQueue.
Currently if you wish to specify a Comparator you must also supply a size.
This addition allows use of the default size which is
On 07/22/2013 09:42 PM, Lance Andersen - Oracle wrote:
looks fine Mike
Best
Lance
Yes, fine for me too.
Rémi
On Jul 22, 2013, at 3:24 PM, Mike Duigou wrote:
Hello all;
A simple rewiew for the addition of another constructor to PriorityQueue.
Currently if you wish to specify a Comparator
On 22/07/2013 20:24, Mike Duigou wrote:
Hello all;
A simple rewiew for the addition of another constructor to PriorityQueue.
Currently if you wish to specify a Comparator you must also supply a size. This
addition allows use of the default size which is good for two reason; you don't
have to
Mike,
I know the description is pulled from the previous constructor, but both
sound a bit awkward. Both can probably benefit from an improvement.
Currently:
Creates a {@code PriorityQueue} with the default initial capacity that
orders its elements according to the specified comparator.
Reasonable comment but unfortunately missed my push by mere seconds. I've made
a note to correct the docs but will likely wait for some other issue to
incorporate it.
Mike
On Jul 22 2013, at 14:00 , Paul Benedict wrote:
Mike,
I know the description is pulled from the previous constructor,
10 matches
Mail list logo
