Hello Joe,
[jw] as I mentioned, pre/pre is needed for the code snippet.
Fixed, please see
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~avstepan/8077332/webrev.01/jaxp/src/java.xml/share/classes/javax/xml/stream/XMLStreamReader.java.udiff.html
[jw] I saw in a few cases where two @code tags are next to each
Hi Alexander,
That fixed the issue in the existing Javadoc. The JAXP changes look good
now.
Thanks for doing this!
Best,
Joe
On 4/17/2015 4:36 AM, alexander stepanov wrote:
Hello Joe,
[jw] as I mentioned, pre/pre is needed for the code snippet.
Fixed, please see
Thanks!
Regards,
Alexander
On 17.04.2015 19:33, huizhe wang wrote:
Hi Alexander,
That fixed the issue in the existing Javadoc. The JAXP changes look
good now.
Thanks for doing this!
Best,
Joe
On 4/17/2015 4:36 AM, alexander stepanov wrote:
Hello Joe,
[jw] as I mentioned, pre/pre is
Please note also that a couple of new files were touched:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~avstepan/8077332/webrev.01/jaxws/src/java.annotations.common/share/classes/javax/annotation/PostConstruct.java.udiff.html
I'm sorry, two extra files touched -
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~avstepan/8077332/webrev.01/jaxws/src/java.activation/share/classes/javax/activation/MailcapCommandMap.java.udiff.html
Hello Joe,
Thanks!
as I mentioned, pre/pre is needed for the code snippet.
Oh, yes, that was that was forgotten.
BTW, have you compiled
Yes; some javadoc errors were fixed as well
and verified the Javadoc after the changes?
Only briefly. So as the above example shows I have to look it over
Hello Lance,
Thanks.
Regards,
Alexander
On 16.04.2015 19:58, Lance Andersen wrote:
Hi Alexander,
These seem to be OK
Best
Lance
On Apr 16, 2015, at 10:07 AM, alexander stepanov
alexander.v.stepa...@oracle.com
mailto:alexander.v.stepa...@oracle.com wrote:
I'm sorry, two extra files
Hi Alexander,
Looks very good. Thanks for making all the changes!
Please note that for the JAXWS, you may need to check with JAXWS/Miran
(miroslav@oracle.com). Changes to JAXWS generally goes into the
standalone first. They do periodic integration.
For the jaxp portion:
---
Hi Alexander,
These seem to be OK
Best
Lance
On Apr 16, 2015, at 10:07 AM, alexander stepanov
alexander.v.stepa...@oracle.com wrote:
I'm sorry, two extra files touched -
Hello Joe,
The copyright changes were reverted.
Please review the updated fix:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~avstepan/8077332/webrev.01/
(code/code replaced with {@code}, removed unnecessary /p,
used @literal tag).
Thanks,
Alexander
On 13.04.2015 21:19, huizhe wang wrote:
On 4/13/2015
On 4/13/2015 4:42 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 13/04/2015 12:22, alexander stepanov wrote:
Hello Joe,
Thank you for the notes;
Copyright year shall not be changed.
That seems to be a bit controversial point; sometimes (while cleaning
docs) I was asked to do that, other times - not to do
Thanks!
On 10.04.2015 20:07, Sean Mullan wrote:
On 04/10/2015 12:01 PM, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 10/04/2015 16:50, alexander stepanov wrote:
Hello,
Could you please review the following fix
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~avstepan/8077332/
for
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8077332
On 13/04/2015 12:22, alexander stepanov wrote:
Hello Joe,
Thank you for the notes;
Copyright year shall not be changed.
That seems to be a bit controversial point; sometimes (while cleaning
docs) I was asked to do that, other times - not to do that. Our
internal policy seemingly assigns to
Hello Joe,
Thank you for the notes;
Copyright year shall not be changed.
That seems to be a bit controversial point; sometimes (while cleaning
docs) I was asked to do that, other times - not to do that. Our internal
policy seemingly assigns to change the 2nd date every time the sources
Hello Alan,
Thank you.
Regards,
Alexander
On 10.04.2015 19:01, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 10/04/2015 16:50, alexander stepanov wrote:
Hello,
Could you please review the following fix
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~avstepan/8077332/
for
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8077332
Some HTML
15 matches
Mail list logo
