On 21/12/2018 13:43, Langer, Christoph wrote:
Hi Alan,
Adding support for POSIX file permissions to the zip APIs is problematic
as we've been discussing here. There are security concerns and also
concerns that how it interacts with JAR files and signed JAR in
particular. I don't disagree that
Hi Alan,
thanks for looking at this issue. I've dived into the ZipFS
implementation during the last weeks and together with Christoph we've
extended and improved both the implementation the test coverage. As
Christoph already emphasized, this change is only for improving
jdk.nio.zipfs without any
Hi Alan,
> Adding support for POSIX file permissions to the zip APIs is problematic
> as we've been discussing here. There are security concerns and also
> concerns that how it interacts with JAR files and signed JAR in
> particular. I don't disagree that we can come to agreement on zipfs
>
On 21/12/2018 10:41, Langer, Christoph wrote:
Hi folks,
getting back to the topic of adding POSIX file permission support to
jdk.zipfs... I think as we are now in the early stages of JDK13, it's a good
point in time to get some (hopefully final) activity on that one.
In the last review
Hi folks,
getting back to the topic of adding POSIX file permission support to
jdk.zipfs... I think as we are now in the early stages of JDK13, it's a good
point in time to get some (hopefully final) activity on that one.
In the last review discussions you were asking me to provide some
