On 08/05/15 13:13, Pavel Rappo wrote:
Here's the latest update:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~prappo/8029689/webrev.01/
The source changes look good to me Pavel.
Just a few minor comments on the test:
1) There is a trivial System.out on L143 that could be removed.
2) L157, is this
Here's the latest update:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~prappo/8029689/webrev.01/
-Pavel
On 21 Apr 2015, at 09:08, Chris Hegarty chris.hega...@oracle.com wrote:
On 21 Apr 2015, at 03:00, David Holmes david.hol...@oracle.com wrote:
On 21/04/2015 1:24 AM, Chris Hegarty wrote:
On
On 21 Apr 2015, at 03:00, David Holmes david.hol...@oracle.com wrote:
On 21/04/2015 1:24 AM, Chris Hegarty wrote:
On 20/04/15 16:17, Lance Andersen wrote:
Hi Pavel,
So we are just documenting/clarifying the current behavior from what I
can tell from the change?
Looking at the
On 21/04/2015 1:24 AM, Chris Hegarty wrote:
On 20/04/15 16:17, Lance Andersen wrote:
Hi Pavel,
So we are just documenting/clarifying the current behavior from what I
can tell from the change?
Looking at the testcase, it passes with the current JDK 9 ( and 8 ), so
this is just documenting
Hi everyone,
Could you please review my change for JDK-8029689
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~prappo/8029689/webrev.00/
---
There is a long-standing issue when platform implementations of java.io.Reader
throw
On 20/04/15 16:17, Lance Andersen wrote:
Hi Pavel,
So we are just documenting/clarifying the current behavior from what I can tell
from the change?
Looking at the testcase, it passes with the current JDK 9 ( and 8 ), so
this is just documenting existing behavior.
If so, this looks OK
Hi Pavel,
So we are just documenting/clarifying the current behavior from what I can tell
from the change? If so, this looks OK assuming you have an approved CCC? The
test seems fine.
I am assuming there should not be any issues here but would be good to hear
from others on this change as
