On 10/11/2011 9:50 PM, Gary Adams wrote:
On 11/10/11 2:22 AM, David Holmes wrote:
Aside: it would be good if whomever is going to do the commits for you
could assist with publishing webrevs for these changes.
There was a bulk request to add Vivian's team to the openjdk
authors list that may
Here's a revised diff for the KillThread timing problem :
- added current CR# to @bug tag
- capture the thread from the timer task
- wait for the timertask thread to be visible to the main thread
then join the thread before fall through to attempt the second
timertask schedule
Hi Gary,
On 10/11/2011 5:36 AM, Gary Adams wrote:
Here's a revised diff for the KillThread timing problem :
- added current CR# to @bug tag
I don't think that is correct. AFAIK the @bug indicates what bug this
test is testing the fix for, not which bugs modified the test. (Ditto
for your
On 5/11/2011 8:37 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 04/11/2011 15:52, Gary Adams wrote:
:
I'll attempt a simple fix for the KillThread case by replacing :
Thread.sleep(100);
with a simple loop
do {
Thread.sleep(100);
} while (waiting);
where the TimerTask runnable will clear the flag
with waiting
I'm taking a look at some older timing based bugs that may cause problems
on slower machines
6818464: TEST_BUG: Timeout values in several java/util tests are insufficient
I'd like to split this bug into two, based on the example problems that are
mentioned in the bug report.
The first example
On 04/11/2011 15:52, Gary Adams wrote:
:
I'll attempt a simple fix for the KillThread case by replacing :
Thread.sleep(100);
with a simple loop
do {
Thread.sleep(100);
} while (waiting);
where the TimerTask runnable will clear the flag
with waiting = false once
