Deven,
The fix is submitted to openjdk tl workspace
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/df33f5f750ec
-Dmitry
On 2012-04-26 05:21, Deven You wrote:
Hi Dmitry,
Thanks for your help. I have created a CR with internal id 2236492 which
hasn't be published yet. So please set this
Hi Dmitry,
I have verified the change set. Thanks for your commit!
On 05/17/2012 03:44 PM, Dmitry Samersoff wrote:
Deven,
The fix is submitted to openjdk tl workspace
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/df33f5f750ec
-Dmitry
On 2012-04-26 05:21, Deven You wrote:
Hi Dmitry,
Deven,
Thank you!
On 2012-04-26 05:21, Deven You wrote:
Hi Dmitry,
Thanks for your help. I have created a CR with internal id 2236492 which
hasn't be published yet. So please set this internal CR id as duplicate
to 716419 as well.
This is the original mail for this problem:
Deven,
CR number is 7164191 .
Could you re-send me your original e-mail with problem description and
webrev link.
I'll put it to CR comment field.
-Dmitry
On 2012-04-24 16:15, Dmitry Samersoff wrote:
Deven,
After close look and off-line discussion with David Holmes,
the changes
Hi Dmitry,
Thanks for your help. I have created a CR with internal id 2236492 which
hasn't be published yet. So please set this internal CR id as duplicate
to 716419 as well.
This is the original mail for this problem:
Deven,
After close look and off-line discussion with David Holmes,
the changes looks good for me.
I'll take care of the rest.
We have one more place in Agent.java executing exactly the same code
so I'll change both of them on your behalf.
-Dmitry
On 2012-04-23 11:43, Deven You wrote:
Deven,
On 23/04/2012 3:54 PM, Deven You wrote:
On 04/18/2012 02:20 PM, Deven You wrote:
On 04/18/2012 01:34 PM, Mandy Chung wrote:
I think this could still run into CME. System Properties is not a
synchronized map and the setter methods (System.setProperty or
Properties.put method) doesn't
Except of course that Properties is a Hashtable and synchronizes on
'this' for all public methods. So locking the properties object in the
client code will guarantee exclusive access to it.
Sorry about that.
David
-
On 23/04/2012 4:30 PM, David Holmes wrote:
Deven,
On 23/04/2012 3:54
Thanks David,
So is it ok for you to contribute this patch?
On 04/23/2012 02:36 PM, David Holmes wrote:
Except of course that Properties is a Hashtable and synchronizes on
'this' for all public methods. So locking the properties object in the
client code will guarantee exclusive access to it.
On 23/04/2012 5:43 PM, Deven You wrote:
Thanks David,
So is it ok for you to contribute this patch?
You can count me as a Reviewer, but it still needs sign-off from Mandy
as a serviceability representative.
I don't have the spare cycles to act as sponsor for this if you need
someone to
On 04/23/2012 02:36 PM, David Holmes wrote:
Except of course that Properties is a Hashtable and synchronizes on
'this' for all public methods. So locking the properties object in the
client code will guarantee exclusive access to it.
David, thanks for looking at this closer. I missed that
Deven,
Sorry for stepping latter.
I'll sponsor this fix, but I need some time to take a close look at
changes as I don't understand clearly why synchronization should help in
this case.
-Dmitry
On 2012-04-23 23:36, Mandy Chung wrote:
On 04/23/2012 02:36 PM, David Holmes wrote:
Except
On 04/18/2012 02:20 PM, Deven You wrote:
On 04/18/2012 01:34 PM, Mandy Chung wrote:
On 4/17/2012 12:33 AM, Deven You wrote:
I think this could still run into CME. System Properties is not a
synchronized map and the setter methods (System.setProperty or
Properties.put method) doesn't
On 04/18/2012 01:34 PM, Mandy Chung wrote:
On 4/17/2012 12:33 AM, Deven You wrote:
I think this could still run into CME. System Properties is not a
synchronized map and the setter methods (System.setProperty or
Properties.put method) doesn't synchronize on the Properties object.
Hi
On 04/12/2012 10:09 AM, Mandy Chung wrote:
On 4/11/2012 12:36 AM, Deven You wrote:
Hi core-libs-devs,
I am not sure if sun.management.Agent belongs to jmx-dev mailing
list, if so please anyone tell me.
serviceability-dev (cc'ed) is the mailing list for this patch.
This issue is that the
Hi core-libs-devs,
I am not sure if sun.management.Agent belongs to jmx-dev mailing list,
if so please anyone tell me.
This issue is that the sun.management.Agent.loadManagementProperties()
will invoke properties.putAll which will throw
ConcurrentModifcationException if there are other
On 4/11/2012 12:36 AM, Deven You wrote:
Hi core-libs-devs,
I am not sure if sun.management.Agent belongs to jmx-dev mailing list,
if so please anyone tell me.
serviceability-dev (cc'ed) is the mailing list for this patch.
This issue is that the
17 matches
Mail list logo
