On 02/12/2014 05:36 PM, Henry Jen wrote:
On 02/12/2014 07:05 AM, Wang Weijun wrote:
This line does not compile
Files.list(Paths.get("/secret")).forEach(x -> Files.write(x, new
byte[Files.size(x)]);
because Files.write() and Files.size() throw IOE. Then what's the
best way to make it wor
On 12/02/2014 16:36, Henry Jen wrote:
I am not sure there is a "recommended" way. Depends on how you need to
handle those exceptions, I'll put the lambda in a private function to
take care those exception, and surpress them in a UncheckedIOException.
Yes, I think it depends on whether he want
On Feb 12, 2014, at 4:05 PM, Wang Weijun wrote:
> This line does not compile
>
> Files.list(Paths.get("/secret")).forEach(x -> Files.write(x, new
> byte[Files.size(x)]);
>
> because Files.write() and Files.size() throw IOE. Then what's the best way to
> make it work?
>
It depends...
Some
On 02/12/2014 07:05 AM, Wang Weijun wrote:
This line does not compile
Files.list(Paths.get("/secret")).forEach(x -> Files.write(x, new
byte[Files.size(x)]);
because Files.write() and Files.size() throw IOE. Then what's the best way to
make it work?
(I find some old threads on this on lam
This line does not compile
Files.list(Paths.get("/secret")).forEach(x -> Files.write(x, new
byte[Files.size(x)]);
because Files.write() and Files.size() throw IOE. Then what's the best way to
make it work?
(I find some old threads on this on lambda-dev. Maybe we have a recommended way
now?)