> This set of updates reduces contention-based performance loss under heavy
> over-subscription, while also improving perfomance more generally.
Doug Lea has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or
a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought
On Thu, 3 Jul 2025 09:53:30 GMT, Kieran Farrell wrote:
>> src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/UUID.java line 212:
>>
>>> 210: * @since 26
>>> 211: */
>>> 212: public static UUID unixEpochTimeMillis() {
>>
>> Is there a list anywhere on the names that have been discussed already?
Hi Alan,
Thanks for your reply.
On Fri, 2025-09-05 at 10:28 +0100, Alan Bateman wrote:
>
> On 05/09/2025 09:43, Geliang Tang wrote:
>
>
> >
> > :
> >
> > 3. Proposed Java API Changes
> >
> > The goal is to allow Java applications to opt-in to using MPTCP
> > when
> > creating sockets, w
On Thu, 4 Sep 2025 18:24:57 GMT, Matias Saavedra Silva
wrote:
>> The logic located in `ClassVerifier::ends_in_athrow()` is no longer required
>> by the JVM Spec as of Java SE 22 (see JVMS 4.10) and the error cases should
>> be handled by the stack map table and its rules for `uninitializedThis
On Fri, 5 Sep 2025 08:13:28 GMT, erifan wrote:
> Intrinsic support for `VectorMask.laneIsSet` with a **variable** input index
> was introduced in PR #14200, but was inadvertently broken by PR #25673. This
> PR restores the intrinsic functionality and adds some JTReg tests.
>
> Benchmarks on Nv
> [JDK-8356439] (#26413) conflicted with [JDK-8362893] (#26493), caused `tier1`
> failures, and hence, backed out in [JDK-8366693] (#27050). This PR
> reintroduces JDK-8356439 with sufficient fixes.
>
> [JDK-8356439]: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8356439
> [JDK-8362893]: https://bugs.open
On Thu, 4 Sep 2025 09:41:43 GMT, Volkan Yazici wrote:
>> [JDK-8356439] (#26413) conflicted with [JDK-8362893] (#26493), caused
>> `tier1` failures, and hence, backed out in [JDK-8366693] (#27050). This PR
>> reintroduces JDK-8356439 with sufficient fixes.
>>
>> [JDK-8356439]: https://bugs.open
On Sat, 6 Sep 2025 13:48:53 GMT, Francesco Andreuzzi wrote:
>> In this PR I introduce some constants in `StackMapGenerator`. No change in
>> logic is expected.
>>
>> Passes tests in `jdk/classfile`.
>
> Francesco Andreuzzi has updated the pull request incrementally with one
> additional commit
On Sat, 6 Sep 2025 13:48:53 GMT, Francesco Andreuzzi wrote:
>> In this PR I introduce some constants in `StackMapGenerator`. No change in
>> logic is expected.
>>
>> Passes tests in `jdk/classfile`.
>
> Francesco Andreuzzi has updated the pull request incrementally with one
> additional commit
This test fails with errors like
>'=C:=,=ExitValue=3,PROCESSOR_ARCHITECTURE=ARM64,SystemRoot=C:\Windows,'< not
equal to '=C:=,=ExitValue=3,SystemRoot=C:\Windows,'
The test does not expect the PROCESSOR_ARCHITECTURE variable to be returned
from the ProcessBuilder (called at
https://github.com/o
> This set of updates reduces contention-based performance loss under heavy
> over-subscription, while also improving perfomance more generally.
Doug Lea has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit
since the last revision:
Refactor to improve locality and signalling
On Sat, 6 Sep 2025 13:48:53 GMT, Francesco Andreuzzi wrote:
>> In this PR I introduce some constants in `StackMapGenerator`. No change in
>> logic is expected.
>>
>> Passes tests in `jdk/classfile`.
>
> Francesco Andreuzzi has updated the pull request incrementally with one
> additional commit
On Sat, 6 Sep 2025 13:55:03 GMT, Chen Liang wrote:
>> Francesco Andreuzzi has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> inclusive
>
> Reviewer's note: This brings more parity with c++ verifier code as done in
> JDK-8359920 (28e96e333b
On Sat, 6 Sep 2025 13:22:56 GMT, Chen Liang wrote:
>> Francesco Andreuzzi has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> inclusive
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/jdk/internal/classfile/impl/StackMapGenerator.java
> line 188:
>
>> 186
> In this PR I introduce some constants in `StackMapGenerator`. No change in
> logic is expected.
>
> Passes tests in `jdk/classfile`.
Francesco Andreuzzi has updated the pull request incrementally with one
additional commit since the last revision:
inclusive
-
Changes:
- all
> In this PR I introduce some constants in `StackMapGenerator`. No change in
> logic is expected.
>
> Passes tests in `jdk/classfile`.
Francesco Andreuzzi has updated the pull request incrementally with one
additional commit since the last revision:
Apply suggestions from code review
Co
On Fri, 5 Sep 2025 22:47:58 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
>> make/modules/java.base/gensrc/GensrcBuffer.gmk line 162:
>>
>>> 160:$$(CAT) $$($1_BIN_SNIPPET_FILES) >> $$($1_REAL_OUTPUT).tmp
>>> 161:$$(ECHO) "}" >> $$($1_REAL_OUTPUT).tmp
>>> 162:$$(MV) $$($1_REAL_OUTPUT).tm
On Mon, 1 Sep 2025 09:00:32 GMT, Francesco Andreuzzi wrote:
> In this PR I introduce some constants in `StackMapGenerator`. No change in
> logic is expected.
>
> Passes tests in `jdk/classfile`.
Hi @liach, could you have a look at this PR since you opened the ticket?
-
PR Comment
On Sat, 6 Sep 2025 01:04:56 GMT, Chen Liang wrote:
> #26749 was merged 4 days ago. Can we integrate this one now?
I think it would be useful to get input from @dholmes-ora and @lkorinth before
doing this. There seems to be several timeout issues in the last few days, a
few follow-on changes t
19 matches
Mail list logo
