On Fri, 8 Sep 2023 14:59:38 GMT, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
> Look reasonable to me. If tier2 and all jndi tests are still passing, I'm
> good with it.
Thanks for the review Daniel. `tier1`, `tier2`, `tier3` and JNDI/LDAP JCK tests
showed no failures with the change proposed here.
-
PR
> The change proposed in this PR improves the behavior of the JDK JNDI/LDAP
> provider when running in a virtual thread. Currently, when an LDAP operation
> is performed from a virtual thread context a pinned carrier thread is
> detected:
>
>
On Thu, 31 Aug 2023 22:48:30 GMT, Aleksei Efimov wrote:
> The change proposed in this PR improves the behavior of the JDK JNDI/LDAP
> provider when running in a virtual thread. Currently, when an LDAP operation
> is performed from a virtual thread context a pinned carrier thread is
>
The change proposed in this PR improves the behavior of the JDK JNDI/LDAP
provider when running in a virtual thread. Currently, when an LDAP operation is
performed from a virtual thread context a pinned carrier thread is detected:
Thread[#29,ForkJoinPool-1-worker-1,5,CarrierThreads]
