Re: RFR: 8301341: LinkedTransferQueue does not respect timeout for poll() [v6]

2023-07-20 Thread Doug Lea
On Mon, 17 Jul 2023 14:45:57 GMT, Andrey Turbanov wrote: >> Doug Lea has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge >> or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought >> in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains seven additional commits

Re: RFR: 8301341: LinkedTransferQueue does not respect timeout for poll() [v6]

2023-07-17 Thread Andrey Turbanov
On Thu, 13 Jul 2023 19:21:01 GMT, Doug Lea wrote: >> This now uses Thread.isVirtual to distinguish spin vs immediate block cases, >> enabling re-introduction of spin control from the previous version, removing >> anomalies like this one. > > Doug Lea has updated the pull request with a new

Re: RFR: 8301341: LinkedTransferQueue does not respect timeout for poll() [v6]

2023-07-13 Thread Viktor Klang
On Thu, 13 Jul 2023 19:21:01 GMT, Doug Lea wrote: >> This now uses Thread.isVirtual to distinguish spin vs immediate block cases, >> enabling re-introduction of spin control from the previous version, removing >> anomalies like this one. > > Doug Lea has updated the pull request with a new

Re: RFR: 8301341: LinkedTransferQueue does not respect timeout for poll() [v6]

2023-07-13 Thread Doug Lea
> This now uses Thread.isVirtual to distinguish spin vs immediate block cases, > enabling re-introduction of spin control from the previous version, removing > anomalies like this one. Doug Lea has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or a rebase. The incremental