On Tue, 5 Dec 2023 12:58:45 GMT, Markus KARG wrote:
>> I suspect it's left over from a previous iteration. In any case, limiting it
>> to a small number of output streams makes this easier to look at. BAOS and
>> FOS seem okay, POP seems okay too but legacy and not interesting.
>
>> I suspect
On Tue, 5 Dec 2023 08:27:09 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
> I suspect it's left over from a previous iteration. In any case, limiting it
> to a small number of output streams makes this easier to look at. BAOS and
> FOS seem okay, POP seems okay too but legacy and not interesting.
Agreed for a
On Tue, 5 Dec 2023 07:37:39 GMT, Markus KARG wrote:
>> Brian Burkhalter has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> 8321053: instanceof -> ==
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/java/io/ByteArrayInputStream.java line 213:
>
>> 211:
On Mon, 4 Dec 2023 20:16:12 GMT, Brian Burkhalter wrote:
>> Pass `ByteArrayInputStream.buf ` directly to the `OutputStream` parameter of
>> `BAIS.transferTo` only if the target stream is in the `java.io` package.
>
> Brian Burkhalter has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>
> Pass `ByteArrayInputStream.buf ` directly to the `OutputStream` parameter of
> `BAIS.transferTo` only if the target stream is in the `java.io` package.
Brian Burkhalter has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
commit since the last revision:
8321053: instanceof -> ==
