On Tue, 16 Jan 2024 18:03:34 GMT, Claes Redestad wrote:
>> There's an unused concept of a pluginConfig that is passed into the jlink
>> compress plugins, however we always pass null here and the code seems broken
>> (the pluginConfig wouldn't have been stored properly). This seem to be a
>> le
On Tue, 16 Jan 2024 18:03:34 GMT, Claes Redestad wrote:
>> There's an unused concept of a pluginConfig that is passed into the jlink
>> compress plugins, however we always pass null here and the code seems broken
>> (the pluginConfig wouldn't have been stored properly). This seem to be a
>> le
> There's an unused concept of a pluginConfig that is passed into the jlink
> compress plugins, however we always pass null here and the code seems broken
> (the pluginConfig wouldn't have been stored properly). This seem to be a
> left-over from a more generic plugin design that never came to f
