On Fri, 10 May 2024 04:55:21 GMT, Chen Liang wrote:
>> GenerateJLIClassesHelper has been making wrong assumptions about Invoker's
>> LambdaForm method type parameters. Since they are distinct from those of
>> Linkers, they are now tracked and generated separately. It seems that no
>> proper in
On Fri, 10 May 2024 04:55:21 GMT, Chen Liang wrote:
>> GenerateJLIClassesHelper has been making wrong assumptions about Invoker's
>> LambdaForm method type parameters. Since they are distinct from those of
>> Linkers, they are now tracked and generated separately. It seems that no
>> proper in
On Fri, 10 May 2024 04:55:21 GMT, Chen Liang wrote:
>> GenerateJLIClassesHelper has been making wrong assumptions about Invoker's
>> LambdaForm method type parameters. Since they are distinct from those of
>> Linkers, they are now tracked and generated separately. It seems that no
>> proper in
On Fri, 10 May 2024 04:55:21 GMT, Chen Liang wrote:
>> GenerateJLIClassesHelper has been making wrong assumptions about Invoker's
>> LambdaForm method type parameters. Since they are distinct from those of
>> Linkers, they are now tracked and generated separately. It seems that no
>> proper in
> GenerateJLIClassesHelper has been making wrong assumptions about Invoker's
> LambdaForm method type parameters. Since they are distinct from those of
> Linkers, they are now tracked and generated separately. It seems that no
> proper invoker was ever generated before, except it happens that mo
