On Mon, 5 Sep 2022 07:38:33 GMT, Thomas Stuefe wrote:
> So I guess at the minimum we would have to downport those test changes to be
> able to test older JDKs with the new jtreg, right?
Yes. Otherwise those tests will fail as they still do depend on hard-coded
names of 3rd-party JAR files.
On Mon, 5 Sep 2022 07:18:09 GMT, Christian Stein wrote:
> > Is jtreg 7 downward compatible? Can I use it to test older JDKs, if yes,
> > down to which version?
>
> Yes, down to JDK 11.
>
> Quote from [Coming soon: jtreg
> 7](https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/jdk-dev/2022-August/006869.html)
On Mon, 5 Sep 2022 06:36:04 GMT, Thomas Stuefe wrote:
> Is jtreg 7 downward compatible? Can I use it to test older JDKs, if yes, down
> to which version?
Yes, down to JDK 11.
Quote from [Coming soon: jtreg
7](https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/jdk-dev/2022-August/006869.html)
> Also
On Mon, 5 Sep 2022 06:12:18 GMT, Christian Stein wrote:
>> Please review the change to update to using jtreg 7.
>>
>> The primary change is to the `jib-profiles.js` file, which specifies the
>> version of jtreg to use, for those systems that rely on this file. In
>> addition, the
> Please review the change to update to using jtreg 7.
>
> The primary change is to the `jib-profiles.js` file, which specifies the
> version of jtreg to use, for those systems that rely on this file. In
> addition, the `requiredVersion` has been updated in the various `TEST.ROOT`
> files.
