Hi All,
Please review the very small change in TEST.groups file.
Webrev link:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~skovalev/dkononen/8077866/webrev.00/
Bug id: JDK-8077866 https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8077866
Testing: automated
Description:
The following tests cannot be run on compact
Hi,
Could someone please review this very small fix.
The class JImageTask
(src/jdk.jlink/share/classes/jdk/tools/jimage/JImageTask.java) has references
to an info message by 'err.cannot.create.dir' key. Unfortunately the
corresponding resource file
Hi,
Optimized buffer's capacity checks.
WEBREV: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dkononenko/8169715/webrev.02
>
> Could please someone review the fix for JDK-8169715.
>
> The problem occurs when jimage tool is attempting to read an empty or
> incomplete image. The current implementation
Hi,
Could please someone review the fix for JDK-8169715.
The problem occurs when jimage tool is attempting to read an empty or
incomplete image. The current implementation works with ByteBuffer and always
relies on that there's enough data to inspect the image. This results in IAE
inside
Hi,
>
> On 06/02/2017 10:27, Denis Kononenko wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Could someone please review this very small fix.
> >
> > The class JImageTask
> (src/jdk.jlink/share/classes/jdk/tools/jimage/JImageTask.java) has
> references to an info message by 'e
Hi,
Could someone please review these new tests for jimage utility.
There're 5 new files containing tests to cover use cases for 'info',
'list', 'extract' and other options. No new tests for 'verify'.
BUGURL: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8167240
WEBREV:
Looks OK to me.
> I can suggest two more cases. A directory and file symlink can be
> passed in options where tool requires a file path.
>
> —Andrey
>
> > On 8 Nov 2016, at 16:17, Denis Kononenko
> <denis.konone...@oracle.com> wrote:
> >
>
ry. Then, of course, unneeded module
> dependencies are questionable.
>
> Shura
>
>
> > On Nov 3, 2016, at 6:29 AM, Denis Kononenko
> <denis.konone...@oracle.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've done some rework accordingly to Alan's and Shura's
Hi Andrey,
No, it isn't. I submitted a new CR:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8167384.
Thank you,
Denis.
> Hi,
>
> Looks OK. Is it 100% pass rate?
>
> —Andrey
> > On 9 Nov 2016, at 20:36, Denis Kononenko
> <denis.konone...@oracle.com> wrote:
> &g
Hi,
Could someone please review this small fix.
Recently several failing test cases were delivered into jdk9-dev by my mistake
(https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8167240). I've just renamed these
test cases to temporarily avoid their execution. They should be renamed back
when
:
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8167384.
>
> Thank you,
> Denis.
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Looks OK. Is it 100% pass rate?
> >
> > —Andrey
> > > On 9 Nov 2016, at 20:36, Denis Kononenko
> > <denis.konone...@oracle.com> wrote:
> >
/8167240/webrev.01/
Thank you,
Denis.
On 06.10.2016 19:37, Denis Kononenko wrote:
Hi,
Could someone please review these new tests for jimage utility.
There're 5 new files containing tests to cover use cases for 'info',
'list', 'extract' and other options. No new tests for 'verify'.
BUGURL: https
12 matches
Mail list logo