,
Katja
Original Message
Subject: Re: RFR(S): 8034960: Serviceability tests using @library
failing with java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError
Date: Fri, 9 May 2014 12:48:56 +0200
From: Staffan Larsen staffan.lar...@oracle.com
To: Yekaterina Kantserova
Hi,
The version b09 of JTreg which contains
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/CODETOOLS-7900178 has been
promoted. So it seems to be time to push the fix for JDK-8034960. I've
made a new webrev to be sure the changes fit in in the latest jdk9
source. The webrev can be found here:
Looks good!
Thanks,
/Staffan
On 9 maj 2014, at 12:43, Yekaterina Kantserova
yekaterina.kantser...@oracle.com wrote:
Hi,
The version b09 of JTreg which contains
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/CODETOOLS-7900178 has been promoted. So
it seems to be time to push the fix for
On 09/05/2014 11:43, Yekaterina Kantserova wrote:
Hi,
The version b09 of JTreg which contains
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/CODETOOLS-7900178 has been
promoted. So it seems to be time to push the fix for JDK-8034960. I've
made a new webrev to be sure the changes fit in in the latest
Staffan, Alan, thanks for reviews! I will wait with pushing it until
Monday to make sure no one has objections.
// Katja
On 05/09/2014 01:07 PM, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 09/05/2014 11:43, Yekaterina Kantserova wrote:
Hi,
The version b09 of JTreg which contains
I’ve looked at a random sample of these changes and they look ok.
Since some of the changes are in non-serviceability code I have also added
core-libs to the review thread.
I’m sure you know this, but for the record: please don’t push this until jtreg
with the fix has been promoted.
Thanks,
On 25/03/2014 12:14, Staffan Larsen wrote:
I’ve looked at a random sample of these changes and they look ok.
Since some of the changes are in non-serviceability code I have also added
core-libs to the review thread.
I’m sure you know this, but for the record: please don’t push this until
On 03/25/2014 01:14 PM, Staffan Larsen wrote:
I’ve looked at a random sample of these changes and they look ok.
Since some of the changes are in non-serviceability code I have also added
core-libs to the review thread.
I’m sure you know this, but for the record: please don’t push this until
On 03/25/2014 02:53 PM, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 25/03/2014 12:14, Staffan Larsen wrote:
I’ve looked at a random sample of these changes and they look ok.
Since some of the changes are in non-serviceability code I have also
added core-libs to the review thread.
I’m sure you know this, but for
On 03/25/2014 07:31 AM, Yekaterina Kantserova wrote:
On 03/25/2014 02:53 PM, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 25/03/2014 12:14, Staffan Larsen wrote:
I’ve looked at a random sample of these changes and they look ok.
Since some of the changes are in non-serviceability code I have also
added core-libs
10 matches
Mail list logo
