Re: RFR: 8279283 - BufferedInputStream should override transferTo [v5]
On Mon, 27 Dec 2021 13:43:12 GMT, Markus KARG wrote: >> Implementation of JDK-8279283 > > Markus KARG has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional > commit since the last revision: > > fixed missing BufferedInputStream I think we should turn it back to draft. - PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/6935
Re: RFR: 8279283 - BufferedInputStream should override transferTo [v5]
On Mon, 27 Dec 2021 13:43:12 GMT, Markus KARG wrote: >> Implementation of JDK-8279283 > > Markus KARG has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional > commit since the last revision: > > fixed missing BufferedInputStream Can this PR be closed or returned to daft? - PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/6935
Re: RFR: 8279283 - BufferedInputStream should override transferTo [v5]
On Mon, 27 Dec 2021 13:43:12 GMT, Markus KARG wrote: >> Implementation of JDK-8279283 > > Markus KARG has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional > commit since the last revision: > > fixed missing BufferedInputStream Please keep this PR open; I will continune work on it soon. - PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/6935
Re: RFR: 8279283 - BufferedInputStream should override transferTo [v5]
On Mon, 27 Dec 2021 13:43:12 GMT, Markus KARG wrote: >> Implementation of JDK-8279283 > > Markus KARG has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional > commit since the last revision: > > fixed missing BufferedInputStream Please keep this PR open; I will continune work on it soon. - PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/6935
Re: RFR: 8279283 - BufferedInputStream should override transferTo [v5]
On Mon, 27 Dec 2021 13:43:12 GMT, Markus KARG wrote: >> Implementation of JDK-8279283 > > Markus KARG has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional > commit since the last revision: > > fixed missing BufferedInputStream Please keep this PR open; I will continune work on it soon. - PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/6935
Re: RFR: 8279283 - BufferedInputStream should override transferTo [v5]
On Mon, 27 Dec 2021 13:43:12 GMT, Markus KARG wrote: >> Implementation of JDK-8279283 > > Markus KARG has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional > commit since the last revision: > > fixed missing BufferedInputStream Please keep open, still working on it. - PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/6935
Re: RFR: 8279283 - BufferedInputStream should override transferTo [v5]
On Mon, 27 Dec 2021 13:43:12 GMT, Markus KARG wrote: >> Implementation of JDK-8279283 > > Markus KARG has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional > commit since the last revision: > > fixed missing BufferedInputStream Good catches, I will look into your comments! - PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/6935
Re: RFR: 8279283 - BufferedInputStream should override transferTo [v5]
On Mon, 27 Dec 2021 13:43:12 GMT, Markus KARG wrote: >> Implementation of JDK-8279283 > > Markus KARG has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional > commit since the last revision: > > fixed missing BufferedInputStream src/java.base/share/classes/java/io/BufferedInputStream.java line 501: > 499: return avail + getInIfOpen().transferTo(out); > 500: } > 501: Hi Markus, did you double check with all the existing subclasses of `BufferedInputStream` that the new implementation of `transferTo` will not cause trouble, if any of the subclasses is overriding `int read(byte[] b, int off, int len)`? If I'm not mistaken - with this new implementation of `transferTo` then `BufferedInputStream::read(byte[] b, int off, int len)` (a public method that can be overridden) will no longer be called by `transferTo`. This could be causing problems if `read` is overriden to do some special processing in the subclass. - PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/6935
Re: RFR: 8279283 - BufferedInputStream should override transferTo [v5]
On Mon, 27 Dec 2021 13:43:12 GMT, Markus KARG wrote: >> Implementation of JDK-8279283 > > Markus KARG has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional > commit since the last revision: > > fixed missing BufferedInputStream I think you'll need to look at the interaction with mark/reset. I don't think you can bypass the buffering when there is a mark set. - PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/6935
Re: RFR: 8279283 - BufferedInputStream should override transferTo [v5]
On Mon, 27 Dec 2021 13:43:12 GMT, Markus KARG wrote: >> Implementation of JDK-8279283 > > Markus KARG has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional > commit since the last revision: > > fixed missing BufferedInputStream Maybe we need to include into this patch the benchmark referenced to in the body of the ticket? - PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/6935
