Re: RFR: 8287171: Refactor null caller tests to a single directory [v3]

2022-05-31 Thread Mandy Chung
On Mon, 30 May 2022 00:10:50 GMT, Tim Prinzing wrote: >> Created a test at test/jdk/jdk/nullCaller called NullCallerTest that creates >> a test module with some resources in it for the actual tests that occur at >> the native level. The native part was switched to c++ instead of c to make >>

Re: RFR: 8287171: Refactor null caller tests to a single directory [v3]

2022-05-31 Thread Mandy Chung
On Mon, 30 May 2022 05:37:16 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote: > I don't think jdk/nullCaller is right location for this. Maybe jni/nullCaller > could work. You'll probably need to add the location to an appropriate > group/tier in test/jdk/TEST.groups, otherwise it won't be run. I also think

Re: RFR: 8287171: Refactor null caller tests to a single directory [v3]

2022-05-30 Thread Magnus Ihse Bursie
On Mon, 30 May 2022 00:10:50 GMT, Tim Prinzing wrote: >> Created a test at test/jdk/jdk/nullCaller called NullCallerTest that creates >> a test module with some resources in it for the actual tests that occur at >> the native level. The native part was switched to c++ instead of c to make >>

Re: RFR: 8287171: Refactor null caller tests to a single directory [v3]

2022-05-29 Thread Alan Bateman
On Mon, 30 May 2022 00:10:50 GMT, Tim Prinzing wrote: >> Created a test at test/jdk/jdk/nullCaller called NullCallerTest that creates >> a test module with some resources in it for the actual tests that occur at >> the native level. The native part was switched to c++ instead of c to make >>

Re: RFR: 8287171: Refactor null caller tests to a single directory [v3]

2022-05-29 Thread Tim Prinzing
> Created a test at test/jdk/jdk/nullCaller called NullCallerTest that creates > a test module with some resources in it for the actual tests that occur at > the native level. The native part was switched to c++ instead of c to make it > easier to create helper objects that reduce the redundant