Re: [core-workflow] Planning the GitHub migration

2017-02-01 Thread Terri Oda
On 2017-01-31 1:24 PM, Ezio Melotti wrote: On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 11:21 PM, Alexander Belopolsky wrote: On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 3:52 PM, Ezio Melotti wrote: you can submit a project idea for GSoC by the 7th of February. Where can I find instructions on how to do it? I may have an idea

Re: [core-workflow] Planning the GitHub migration

2017-01-31 Thread Berker Peksağ
On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 1:43 AM, Brett Cannon wrote: > > > On Tue, 31 Jan 2017 at 14:01 Berker Peksağ wrote: >> >> On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 2:21 AM, Brett Cannon wrote: >> > Update docs.python.org to build from GitHub (push >> > https://github.com/python/psf-salt/pull/91; Berker?) >> >> I can revi

Re: [core-workflow] Planning the GitHub migration

2017-01-31 Thread Brett Cannon
On Tue, 31 Jan 2017 at 14:01 Berker Peksağ wrote: > On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 2:21 AM, Brett Cannon wrote: > > Update docs.python.org to build from GitHub (push > > https://github.com/python/psf-salt/pull/91; Berker?) > > I can review and test this on my development environment, but we > probably

Re: [core-workflow] Planning the GitHub migration

2017-01-31 Thread Berker Peksağ
On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 2:21 AM, Brett Cannon wrote: > Update docs.python.org to build from GitHub (push > https://github.com/python/psf-salt/pull/91; Berker?) I can review and test this on my development environment, but we probably need someone from the infra team to do the merging :) --Berker

Re: [core-workflow] Planning the GitHub migration

2017-01-31 Thread Ezio Melotti
On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 11:21 PM, Alexander Belopolsky wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 3:52 PM, Ezio Melotti > wrote: >> >> you can submit a project idea for GSoC by the 7th of >> February. > > > Where can I find instructions on how to do it? I may have an idea to > submit. See http://python

Re: [core-workflow] Planning the GitHub migration

2017-01-31 Thread Alexander Belopolsky
On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 3:52 PM, Ezio Melotti wrote: > you can submit a project idea for GSoC by the 7th of > February. > Where can I find instructions on how to do it? I may have an idea to submit. ___ core-workflow mailing list core-workflow@python.

Re: [core-workflow] Planning the GitHub migration

2017-01-31 Thread Ezio Melotti
On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 8:35 PM, Brett Cannon wrote: > [another missing step; I can't wait to put all of these proverbial "spinning > plates] > > On Tue, 31 Jan 2017 at 10:26 Brett Cannon wrote: >> >> [for my own notes, I forgot something in the list] >> >> On Mon, 30 Jan 2017 at 15:21 Brett Cann

Re: [core-workflow] Planning the GitHub migration

2017-01-31 Thread Brett Cannon
[another missing step; I can't wait to put all of these proverbial "spinning plates] On Tue, 31 Jan 2017 at 10:26 Brett Cannon wrote: > [for my own notes, I forgot something in the list] > > On Mon, 30 Jan 2017 at 15:21 Brett Cannon wrote: > > Assuming I'm right and there are no more blockers f

Re: [core-workflow] Planning the GitHub migration

2017-01-31 Thread Brett Cannon
[for my own notes, I forgot something in the list] On Mon, 30 Jan 2017 at 15:21 Brett Cannon wrote: > Assuming I'm right and there are no more blockers for the migration (see > my other email to this list on that topic), here is my current thinking on > the steps necessary to migrate (I am CC'in

Re: [core-workflow] Planning the GitHub migration

2017-01-31 Thread Benjamin Peterson
I can handle those things. On Mon, Jan 30, 2017, at 15:21, Brett Cannon wrote: > Assuming I'm right and there are no more blockers for the migration (see > my > other email to this list on that topic), here is my current thinking on > the > steps necessary to migrate (I am CC'ing people I'm hoping

Re: [core-workflow] Planning the GitHub migration

2017-01-30 Thread Senthil Kumaran
On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 3:21 PM, Brett Cannon wrote: > Assuming I'm right and there are no more blockers for the migration (see my > other email to this list on that topic), here is my current thinking on the > steps necessary to migrate (I am CC'ing people I'm hoping can help me out > with this p