[core-workflow] Re: Using CLA-assistant for Python

2018-08-30 Thread Stephane Wirtel
On 08/29, Mariatta Wijaya wrote: Following up from past thread about Improving CLA signing process ( https://mail.python.org/mm3/archives/list/core-workflow@python.org/thread/2OY2KGVCKIRJDX325DGKZSVY2IKSDTJJ/ ) Over in Zulip

[core-workflow] Re: Using CLA-assistant for Python

2018-08-30 Thread Berker Peksağ
On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 1:15 AM Mariatta Wijaya wrote: > - Since the status check will be made required, it means every > contribution no matter how trivial, requires CLA. Without it, we can't > merge the pull request. (Maybe only the admins can still merge). Sounds > like this is a good thing an

[core-workflow] Re: Using CLA-assistant for Python

2018-08-30 Thread Nick Coghlan
On Thu, 30 Aug 2018 at 08:15, Mariatta Wijaya wrote: > - Any other issue I didn't think of? > > If nobody has strong objections or raised any issues, I plan to get this > started and set up during Core sprint in a couple weeks. > While I wouldn't expect them to object (since the proposal will sa

[core-workflow] Re: Using CLA-assistant for Python

2018-08-30 Thread Mariatta Wijaya
> > 1. Do we need to use their platform? > 2. If they close the platform for any reason, there is the source code, > we could host it as well. You'll also want to talk to Ernest (PSF Infrastructure director) about > either automating the periodic export of the csv file with all the CLA > signator