在 2013-04-26五的 11:10 -0700，David Hendricks写道：
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 5:13 PM, li guang lig.f...@cn.fujitsu.com
wrote:
Am Donnerstag, den 25.04.2013, 11:59 +0800 schrieb li guang:
do we have plan to add loongson CPU or MIPS ARCH support?
在 2013-04-26五的 22:08 +0200，Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko写
道：
do we have plan to add loongson CPU or MIPS ARCH support?
Loongson platforms are very different from any x86 boards. I believe
that coreboot in this case would get more in the way than help. I ported
GRUB to be
On 29.04.2013 03:18, li guang wrote:
在 2013-04-26五的 22:08 +0200，Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko写
道：
do we have plan to add loongson CPU or MIPS ARCH support?
Loongson platforms are very different from any x86 boards. I believe
that coreboot in this case would get more in the way
not everyone wants or needs grub. So that's part of the point.
ron
--
coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org
http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
On 29.04.2013 04:09, ron minnich wrote:
not everyone wants or needs grub. So that's part of the point.
Could we have a sane discussion about why it's not suitable for this or
that scenario and what would need to be fixed? Not just quasi-fanatical
I don't want it.
signature.asc
Description:
在 2013-04-29一的 03:58 +0200，Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko写
道：
On 29.04.2013 03:18, li guang wrote:
在 2013-04-26五的 22:08 +0200，Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko写
道：
do we have plan to add loongson CPU or MIPS ARCH support?
Loongson platforms are very different from any
Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
not everyone wants or needs grub. So that's part of the point.
Could we have a sane discussion about why it's not suitable
IMO it's a clusterfuck as far as usability is concerned for one. But
this isn't the GRUB mailing list, so actually it's
li guang wrote:
Don't get me wrong, coreboot is great
for x86 but for loongson its init framework is somewhat overkill and
initing naively is more appropriate. What do you think to use as
payload? You need something as GRUB for it since the chip is too small
to hold a kernel anyway.
Yes, I'm querying coreboot for the similar consideration.
Is payload indispensable?
can we directly load kernel image?
Not in the tiny ROM available on this machine (512KiB). And 512K is
absolute maximum you can put on it (parallel flash)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital
On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 7:24 PM, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
phco...@gmail.com wrote:
Could we have a sane discussion about why it's not suitable for this or
that scenario and what would need to be fixed? Not just quasi-fanatical
I don't want it.
I guess I missed the part where not
10 matches
Mail list logo
