Hey all,
from time to time I see the question pop up, which motherboard is
recommended or what laptop is most recommended for coreboot.
What I haven't seen is a suggestion for an energy efficient HTPC. While
one would expect an arm box for this, I still fail to see really well
supported
On 22-07-13 10:47, David Hubbard wrote:
Hi Oliver,
By hold those the recommendations -- did you mean, do those hold the
number one position as a recommendation ? Can you clarify this question?
Get this board and it works really well! ;)
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 2:07 AM, Oliver Schinagl
Hi Oliver,
Ouch, those are pretty big numbers. I was acking towards the Asus F2A85
aswell but will probably look at a very power efficient APU variant. Don't
they come in 65W TDP's? Granted these tdp's are including a GPU.
Keep in mind I'm measuring at the wall. TDP is the rating just for the
A more efficient PSU might save a few watts.
Just a thought.
--
coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org
http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
On 22-07-13 12:23, David Hubbard wrote:
Hi Oliver,
Ouch, those are pretty big numbers. I was acking towards the Asus
F2A85 aswell but will probably look at a very power efficient APU
variant. Don't they come in 65W TDP's? Granted these tdp's are
including a GPU.
Keep in mind
Hey Guys,
Thanks to some pointers that Ron Minnich gave me a few weeks back, I've
been able to debrick my Samsung 550 Chromebook. However, during the time
I waited for my Bus Pirate I started thinking it might be nice to build
my own Coreboot, with a SeaBIOS payload. Now I have a build, but
you need a vga bios for now. You must have the ME firmware.
Try this:
make menuconfig
go to general setup
enable the 'third party binaries' menu item (or whatever it's called)
they should now get downloaded automagically.
Do a cbfstool build/coreboot.rom print
before and after this step, and
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 11:25 AM, Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
gnu...@no-log.org wrote:
It is at least a licensing problem:
That microcode has a proprietary license in its header,
with some terms that are incompatible with the GPLv2...
And coreboot is released under the GPLv2.
Given the effort
On Mon, 15 Jul 2013 08:14:22 -0700
ron minnich rminn...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't see how excluding the new, fixed version from coreboot helps
anything. Further, it means you don't have bug-fixed microcode, which
seems bad.
It is at least a licensing problem:
That microcode has a proprietary
9 matches
Mail list logo
