- Mail d'origine -
De: Luc Verhaegen l...@skynet.be
À: mrnuke mr.nuke...@gmail.com
Cc: ron minnich rminn...@gmail.com, coreboot@coreboot.org
Envoyé: Sat, 05 Apr 2014 03:21:07 +0200 (CEST)
Objet: Re: [coreboot] AMD doesn't get it either in some ways(the
bastards!!!)
On Fri, Apr
Hi Yuval,
someone who has experience porting chipsets could add support for this
i965 chipset with maybe 6-12 months of fulltime work. This is of course
under the (unlikely) assumption that full documentation is available. If
you're doing it as a hobby and have to learn firmware development
On Sat, Apr 05, 2014 at 10:41:18AM +0200, eche...@free.fr wrote:
Naive question : Is it too late to find a remedy to that? Why?
This was mid 2007 til early 2009.
Have you seen any ATI documentation since then?
Have you seen anyone trying to write proper C display code for radeon hw
since
2014-04-05 15:48 GMT+02:00 Luc Verhaegen l...@skynet.be:
On Sat, Apr 05, 2014 at 03:20:08PM +0200, Rudolf Marek wrote:
Hi all,
I think there is OpenRadeonBios. The problem is that thhe AtomBIOS
bytecode is vendor specific blob, which cannot be in principle released
by AMD because it is
2014-04-05 1:24 GMT+02:00 Yuval Adam yuv@gmail.com:
The P965/ICH8 combo is suspiciously lacking from the coreboot supported
chipsets.
Who knows how similar i945 is to i965 ;)
I have a motherboard that might be fit for development on these chipsets
(Gigabyte GA-965P-DS3) and I'm curious
So, in messing with this Pavilion m6_1935dx, I was able to get most of the EC
running as expected. It seems that, at least the (ACPI) register layout is the
same. We can get good battery _and_ AC indicators from it.
When we query the EC (say, doing a cat /sys/class/power/AC/online), it
So, in messing with this Pavilion m6_1935dx, I was able to get most of the EC
running as expected. It seems that, at least the (ACPI) register layout is the
same. We can get good battery _and_ AC indicators from it.
When we query the EC (say, doing a cat /sys/class/power/AC/online), it
On 05.04.2014 19:02, mrnuke wrote:
When an event happens, on the other hand, like a hotkey, or AC is removed, it
does not generate an SCI that would lead to a query call (_Qxx). Instead it
spits out an SMI. I know for a fact that the SCI and SMI GPEs are where we
expect them to be.
What do
On Saturday, April 05, 2014 08:21:21 PM Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
wrote:
On 05.04.2014 19:02, mrnuke wrote:
When an event happens, on the other hand, like a hotkey, or AC is removed,
it does not generate an SCI that would lead to a query call (_Qxx).
Instead it spits out an
9 matches
Mail list logo
