Re: [coreboot] cbfstool: CBFS alignment broken due to FMAP

Hi Ben. Alternatively you can use your own flash map setup file where you modify FMAP_FMAP_SIZE to your needs and point Kconfig to your modified fmd-file. In this way you can leave Makefile.inc unchanged and get your image right as well. Werner -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: coreboot

[coreboot] MbMax coreboot image

I am trying to build coreboot image for MbMax along with TXE module I selected under menuconfig --> chipset --> Add Inteldescriptor.bin file --> Add Intel ME/TXE firmware. When I do a make, I get the error: DD Adding Intel Firmware Descriptor make: *** [add_intel_firmware] Error 1 I did

[coreboot] X86 considered harmfull vs Coreboot

Hi all I found a paper Intel x86 considered harmful Joanna Rutkowska http://blog.invisiblethings.org/papers/2015/x86_harmful.pdf describing things that are belived are security shorcommings of x86 architecture. Many of them are bios / mb and boot process related. I am just awandering how

Re: [coreboot] cbfstool: CBFS alignment broken due to FMAP

Thanks. That also worked. For the benefit of others: I copied build/fmap.fmd to src/mainboard/$VENDOR/$BOARD/ and then updated the FMDFILE config item to point to it. CONFIG_FMDFILE="src/mainboard/$VENDOR/$BOARD/fmap.fmd" It may help to look at util/cbfstool/default-x86.fmd to see the names of

Re: [coreboot] MbMax coreboot image

Hi Supriti, You are supposed to extract the TXE/ME image (and the IFD) from an existing MbMax BIOS. Those files may have been customized by the vendor for your board. Use flashrom to extract the existing BIOS and then use idftool to extract the sections. You may also be able to find a MbMax BIOS

Re: [coreboot] MbMax coreboot image

I should have looked at this URL first: http://wiki.minnowboard.org/Coreboot That covers everything you need to know. Your error is that your path to the IFD/TXE is wrong, so "dd" can't find it. Take a look at src/soc/intel/fsp_baytrail/Makefile.inc in the version of coreboot mentioned in the

Re: [coreboot] X86 considered harmfull vs Coreboot

On 01/19/2016 12:46 PM, NTPT wrote: > Hi all > > I found a paper > Intel x86 considered harmful > Joanna Rutkowska She's screaming, and screaming, louder and louder, yet sadly very few people are actually paying attention. There isn't much we can do from a firmware point of view when the

Re: [coreboot] Building on 64 Bit Linux

Just build the coreboot crossbuild chain and you should be fine. I've been building on 64-bit linux for years. On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 7:39 AM Gregg Levine wrote: > Hello! > Not yet. I'm still bringing over my backups from an earlier period of > time so I can't

[coreboot] Building on 64 Bit Linux

Hello! Is there anything special I need to know when it comes to building releases on a 64 Bit Linux system? This is Slackware64-14.1 as it happens. - Gregg C Levine gregg.drw...@gmail.com "This signature fought the Time Wars, time and again." -- coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org

Re: [coreboot] Building on 64 Bit Linux

Hi Gregg, I'm not sure what tools come installed by default on Slackware, so I can't really say. I'd be happy to try to work out any issues you see and get any special requirements documented. Is there some issue that you're seeing that makes you ask? Martin On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 7:19 AM,

Re: [coreboot] Building on 64 Bit Linux

Hello! Not yet. I'm still bringing over my backups from an earlier period of time so I can't rightfully say. I can state that Slackware travels with a fully up to date tool chain outside of anything specific so there shouldn't be a problem in building the whole thing to start with. - Gregg C