Re: [coreboot] Does the 62xx Series Opteron work *securely* without microcode?

2017-01-27 19:26 GMT+01:00 Timothy Pearson : > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 01/27/2017 12:20 PM, Andrés Domínguez wrote: >> 2017-01-26 16:12 GMT+01:00 ron minnich : >>> >>> A decade later? You should buy a new computer.

[coreboot] Documentation creation for the coreboot wiki - what to do?

I have been given a wiki account and I would like some input as to what is needed in terms of maintance, documentation updating, tutorial creation etc? I am a sysadmin so it is good to offload this kind of stuff to me so that you guys are free to do the programming bits. So far I have

Re: [coreboot] KGPE-D16 with over 128GB RAM - works reliably yet?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/27/2017 03:27 PM, taii...@gmx.com wrote: > Is anyone using this configuration? does it work reliably? I am asking > as I don't know if this has been fixed yet. > > For a real server platform this is a must have, the ram issues are the > one

[coreboot] KGPE-D16 with over 128GB RAM - works reliably yet?

Is anyone using this configuration? does it work reliably? I am asking as I don't know if this has been fixed yet. For a real server platform this is a must have, the ram issues are the one valid point that leah made... - Thanks in advance for any replies -- coreboot mailing list:

Re: [coreboot] Does the 62xx Series Opteron work *securely* without microcode?

On 01/27/2017 03:18 PM, Timothy Pearson wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/27/2017 01:41 PM, Merlin Büge wrote: On Fri, 27 Jan 2017 12:26:56 -0600 Timothy Pearson wrote: Core 2 duo is more than a decade old and I think that it

Re: [coreboot] Does the 62xx Series Opteron work *securely* without microcode?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/27/2017 01:41 PM, Merlin Büge wrote: > On Fri, 27 Jan 2017 12:26:56 -0600 > Timothy Pearson wrote: > > > >>> Core 2 duo is more than a decade old and I think that it should be >>> good enough for a lot of

Re: [coreboot] Does the 62xx Series Opteron work *securely* without microcode?

On Fri, 27 Jan 2017 12:26:56 -0600 Timothy Pearson wrote: > > Core 2 duo is more than a decade old and I think that it should be > > good enough for a lot of tasks. > > > > Andrés > > > > Something to think about: have you tried developing modern software on

Re: [coreboot] Does the 62xx Series Opteron work *securely* without microcode?

On Fri, 27 Jan 2017 12:26:56 -0600 Timothy Pearson wrote: > > Core 2 duo is more than a decade old and I think that it should be > > good enough for a lot of tasks. > > > > Andrés > > > > Something to think about: have you tried developing modern software on

Re: [coreboot] Does the 62xx Series Opteron work *securely* without microcode?

On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 10:28 AM Timothy Pearson < tpear...@raptorengineering.com> wrote: > Yet here we are, again > restricting the tools needed to compile software to non-free systems. > > > we can change the subject. I still believe that if libre is your goal x86 and arm are a lost cause. I

Re: [coreboot] Does the 62xx Series Opteron work *securely* without microcode?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/27/2017 12:20 PM, Andrés Domínguez wrote: > 2017-01-26 16:12 GMT+01:00 ron minnich : >> >> A decade later? You should buy a new computer. > > Core 2 duo is more than a decade old and I think that it should be > good enough

Re: [coreboot] Does the 62xx Series Opteron work *securely* without microcode?

2017-01-26 16:12 GMT+01:00 ron minnich : > > A decade later? You should buy a new computer. Core 2 duo is more than a decade old and I think that it should be good enough for a lot of tasks. Andrés -- coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org

Re: [coreboot] Coreboot binary for ASUS F2A85-M

I'm not really sure what's going on, and without a debug console, it's kind of hard to tell. Here are some random thoughts to give you ideas for what you might want to try next: Does the system boot up otherwise? Is it possible to ssh into it to get the log out with the cbmem utility? That

[coreboot] New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for coreboot

Hi, Please find the latest report on new defect(s) introduced to coreboot found with Coverity Scan. 59 new defect(s) introduced to coreboot found with Coverity Scan. 3 defect(s), reported by Coverity Scan earlier, were marked fixed in the recent build analyzed by Coverity Scan. New defect(s)