[coreboot] How to update the repository and avoid dirty tree with submodules?

2017-03-28 Thread Paul Menzel via coreboot
Dear coreboot folks, Often I am running into problems, when updating the tree. Normally I do `git pull --rebase` to update my branch, and rebase my changes on top of the upstream master branch. But if something in the submodules, under `3rdparty` changes, I get a dirty tree. The same is true,

Re: [coreboot] Coreboot wiki: what license is the content under?

2017-03-28 Thread David Hendricks
This would be a good topic to bring up in the next community chat. On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 1:21 PM, Sam Kuper wrote: > On 21/03/2017, Martin Roth wrote: >> Is there a reason we shouldn't switch to CC BY 4.0? > > Arguably, yes: doing so would permit the

Re: [coreboot] Group demographics

2017-03-28 Thread Julius Werner
> > As fallback/payload is compressed in bios.bin, I'm not sure what strings > will provide. > I did run strings on bios.bin (as well as looking at it in hex editor) and > found nothing > explicitly suggesting depthcharge (or u-boot for that matter) was the > payload. I made > assumption u-boot

Re: [coreboot] Group demographics

2017-03-28 Thread tturne
On 2017-03-24 17:42, Julius Werner wrote: * Google's recovery manifest (from linux_recovery.sh) can pull a recovery image for a specific product, I have yet to find depthcharge as a payload * Obviously I haven't pulled all of the recovery images, but have looked at ~10 * those interested in

Re: [coreboot] Group demographics

2017-03-28 Thread Aaron Durbin via coreboot
On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 3:20 PM, wrote: > On 2017-03-24 17:42, Julius Werner wrote: >>> >>> * Google's recovery manifest (from linux_recovery.sh) can pull a >>> recovery image for a specific product, I have yet to find >>> depthcharge as a payload >>> * Obviously I haven't

Re: [coreboot] Fwd: Ethernet problem in x200

2017-03-28 Thread Nico Huber
On 28.03.2017 01:39, Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli wrote: > On Mon, 27 Mar 2017 16:14:53 +0200 > Zoran Stojsavljevic wrote: > >> [user@localhost projects]$ cat dmesg.txt | grep 00:19.0 >> [0.151652] pci :00:19.0: *[8086:294c*] type 00 class 0x02 >> [

Re: [coreboot] [coreboot-gerrit] Change in coreboot[master]: KBL: Update FSP headers - upgrade to FSP.2.0.0

2017-03-28 Thread Aaron Durbin via coreboot
Why can't I access this CL on gerrit, but I'm getting emails for it? On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 10:10 AM, Subrata Banik (Code Review) wrote: > Subrata Banik has posted comments on this change. ( > https://review.coreboot.org/19023 ) > > Change subject: KBL: Update FSP headers

Re: [coreboot] [PATCH] nb/intel/nehalem/raminit.c: Add timeouts when waiting for heci.

2017-03-28 Thread Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
On Mon, 27 Mar 2017 14:33:23 -0700 Andrey Petrov wrote: > Hi, > > On 03/27/2017 01:05 PM, Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli wrote: > > Since until now, the code running on the management engine is: > > - Signed by its manufacturer > > - Proprietary software, without corresponding

Re: [coreboot] [PATCH] nb/intel/nehalem/raminit.c: Add timeouts when waiting for heci.

2017-03-28 Thread Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
On Mon, 27 Mar 2017 15:19:17 -0500 Timothy Pearson wrote: > In general static timeouts are not a good idea. Is there a reliable > way for coreboot to determine if the ME image has been > "cleaned" (i.e. can it parse the ME descriptor and not even search > for the

[coreboot] New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for coreboot

2017-03-28 Thread scan-admin
Hi, Please find the latest report on new defect(s) introduced to coreboot found with Coverity Scan. 13 new defect(s) introduced to coreboot found with Coverity Scan. 481 defect(s), reported by Coverity Scan earlier, were marked fixed in the recent build analyzed by Coverity Scan. New