Re: [coreboot] SMM save area in MSRs on newer intel CPUs

haswell and on has this. You can see it in the haswell code. We actually opted not to use it but for relocation so we could look at each cpu's save state from a single cpu to see who caused the smi, etc. On Sat, Oct 7, 2017 at 8:38 AM, ron minnich wrote: > can someone point

Re: [coreboot] KGPE-D16/KCMA-D8 TPM support?

On 10/07/2017 11:14 AM, Thierry Laurion wrote: Any input on TPM since that post? I am planning on beginning to work on heads KGPE-D16 heads support, server/workstation on which Qubes v4 actually works. Initialisation of TPM throws errors on from Qubes, but it isn't owned yet, and haven't played

Re: [coreboot] KGPE-D16/KCMA-D8 TPM support?

Any input on TPM since that post? I am planning on beginning to work on heads KGPE-D16 heads support, server/workstation on which Qubes v4 actually works. Initialisation of TPM throws errors on from Qubes, but it isn't owned yet, and haven't played with it yet. Bought this

[coreboot] SMM save area in MSRs on newer intel CPUs

can someone point me at the documents that describe how this works? thanks ron -- coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org https://mail.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot

[coreboot] OCP Winterfell, NERF, Linux and u-root (was: Ability to remotely debug the grub menu in case of boot failure)

Dear Ron, Am Freitag, den 06.10.2017, 16:10 + schrieb ron minnich: > 2 weeks ago I started an OCP winterfell node booting this way. This was > NERF with linux and u-root in flash. it was about 20 seconds for a full > cycle of linux in flash, dhclient, wget, kexec. I ran it 10,000 times, got

Re: [coreboot] [RFC] Successful build with GCC 7.2 and IASL 20170831 for coreboot 4.7

Dear Patrick, Am Freitag, den 06.10.2017, 15:03 +0200 schrieb Patrick Georgi: > 2017-10-06 9:43 GMT+02:00 Paul Menzel: > > Having the code base compatible with future toolchains is quite > > important and convenient in my opinion. > > That's a great argument to switch out the toolchain 4 months

[coreboot] vboot/futility: Two Clang 5 warnings: address-of-packed-member and enum-conversion

Dear coreboot folks, Clang 5.0 shows the warnings below. I don’t know if Clang 4.0 also warns about these. ``` CCfirmware/lib/vboot_api_kernel.o firmware/lib/vboot_api_kernel.c:334:26: error: taking address of packed member 'kernel_version_tpm' of class or structure