[coreboot] Recommendation for Flashing Clips / mass order

Hello, after learning about Coreboot and how to flash, my cheap flashing clip stopped working. Do you have any recommendations if it makes sense to invest a bit more budget and buy a more expensive clip or will the quality be the same? The Pomona 5250 Clip:

Re: [coreboot] [RFC] Successful build with GCC 7.2 and IASL 20170831 for coreboot 4.7

* Paul Menzel [171006 09:43]: > Dear Martin, > > > Am Dienstag, den 03.10.2017, 08:07 -0600 schrieb Martin Roth: > > I'd say that it doesn't make sense to require that coreboot builds > > with anything other than the coreboot toolchain. > > Additionally, It

Re: [coreboot] vboot/futility: Two Clang 5 warnings: address-of-packed-member and enum-conversion

Dear Paul, * Paul Menzel [171007 11:05]: > Dear coreboot folks, > > > Clang 5.0 shows the warnings below. I don’t know if Clang 4.0 also > warns about these. > > ``` > CCfirmware/lib/vboot_api_kernel.o >

Re: [coreboot] AGESA fam15 code removals

* Martin Roth via coreboot [171005 19:00]: > I've got very mixed feelings about pushing the changes that we know aren't > going to work, especially right before we abandon the boards to a branch. We are not abandoning any boards. The whole reason we are doing branches and

[coreboot] ASUS KFSN4-DRE Automated Test Failure [master]

The ASUS KFSN4-DRE fails verification for branch master as of commit 530c6f9cc8dd2c0cd0c586d3d14f11cb8021242f The following tests failed: BOOT_FAILURE Commits since last successful test: 530c6f9 intel/cannonlake_rvp: enable HS400 See attached log for details This message was automatically

Re: [coreboot] Does coreboot table still exist in F000 segment?

* WANG FEI [171013 20:20]: > Hi, all > > Beside placing coreboot table (lb_header) in low RAM (0x0-0x1000), I remember > a > copy of coreboot table should be placed at F000 segment and it can be > controlled with a Kconfig flag, does this feature still exist? I just

Re: [coreboot] Does coreboot table still exist in F000 segment?

I believe that is a seabios option. On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 12:21 PM WANG FEI wrote: > Hi, all > > Beside placing coreboot table (lb_header) in low RAM (0x0-0x1000), I > remember a copy of coreboot table should be placed at F000 segment and it > can be controlled with a

Re: [coreboot] Add socket support for amd/socket-ft1?

Hey Alexander, Alexandre Desnoyers wrote: > I can tell you that this persimmon motherboard is booting on my own > FT1 custom SoC design with very few changes. Can we encourage you to post a patch to include your board into the coreboot repository? //Peter -- coreboot mailing list:

Re: [coreboot] Add socket support for amd/socket-ft1?

Hi, You probably should look into the "persimmon" AMD motherboard, which is the AMD reference design for the FT1. Check in the directory : ./src/mainboard/amd/persimmon/ I can tell you that this persimmon motherboard is booting on my own FT1 custom SoC design with very few changes.