64bit builds are not supported at this time.StefanOn 15 May 2019 22:27, Mike Banon wrote:Here's a final part of coreboot build log for crossgcc-x64 build
attempt. This does not happen while building with crossgcc-i386, so
seems to be x64-only problem.
CC romstage/lib/stack.o
Here's a final part of coreboot build log for crossgcc-x64 build
attempt. This does not happen while building with crossgcc-i386, so
seems to be x64-only problem.
CC romstage/lib/stack.o
CC romstage/lib/timestamp.o
CC romstage/lib/version.o
CC
Hi Everyone,
We are pleased to announce that the FSP External Architecture Specification
v2.1 has been posted to https://www.intel.com/fsp!
Highlights
* Dispatch Mode – A new optional FSP boot mode intended to ease integration
of FSP with PI spec bootloaders. In dispatch mode, FSP-M
On 15.05.19 17:59, Ivan Ivanov wrote:
> Yes, the people are checking AMD as well, and discovered the
> AMD-specific vulnerabilities at their PSP Platform (IN)Security
> Processor.
Unless I missed something about the PSP, I fear, we are talking
past each other. Not only is the PSP a completely
Yes, the people are checking AMD as well, and discovered the
AMD-specific vulnerabilities at their PSP Platform (IN)Security
Processor. Luckily almost all the coreboot-supported AMD computers -
with the exception of some PC Engines boards if I'm not mistaken -
don't have a PSP, so not affected.
On 15.05.19 17:37, Ivan Ivanov wrote:
> Hi Nico, when someone finds a vulnerability at Intel, people do a good
> digging for a similar vulnerability at AMD.
I don't doubt it. But did somebody try to find AMD-specific vulnera-
bilities? Checking if somebody else did the same errors is not the same
Hi Nico, when someone finds a vulnerability at Intel, people do a good
digging for a similar vulnerability at AMD. And so far, if I haven't
missed something, it has been discovered that AMD shares only a few
variants of Spectre together with Intel, while all the other vulns
seem to be
Hi Ivan,
On 15.05.19 17:11, Ivan Ivanov wrote:
Funny vuln names! Luckily AMD (as usual?) is not affected... As
someone wrote at the forums, a hidden price for Intel higher
performance is a holey pants, just for 120 fps in games instead of 110
:P Neglecting security for the purpose of performing
Funny vuln names! Luckily AMD (as usual?) is not affected... As
someone wrote at the forums, a hidden price for Intel higher
performance is a holey pants, just for 120 fps in games instead of 110
:P Neglecting security for the purpose of performing slightly better
by skipping various checks inside
atm i have no gitaccount for that.
here is it from the Debian non-free Repo:
http://security.debian.org/debian-security/pool/updates/non-free/i/intel-microcode/intel-microcode_3.20190514.1~deb9u1.tar.xz
I dont know how to make this usable / fit it in coreboots blob format
Am 15.05.19 um 17:02
On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 9:58 AM Nico Huber wrote:
> On 15.05.19 16:43, Kinky Nekoboi wrote:
> > Someone should push them to coreboot.
>
> Agreed, can you do that?
>
> >
> > Debian already has them.
>
> or alternatively, could you provide an upstream URL, please.
>
On 15.05.19 16:43, Kinky Nekoboi wrote:
Someone should push them to coreboot.
Agreed, can you do that?
Debian already has them.
or alternatively, could you provide an upstream URL, please.
Nico
___
coreboot mailing list -- coreboot@coreboot.org
Someone should push them to coreboot.
Debian already has them.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
coreboot mailing list -- coreboot@coreboot.org
To unsubscribe send an email to coreboot-le...@coreboot.org
13 matches
Mail list logo
