On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 04:46:00PM +, awokd via coreboot wrote:
> Patrick Georgi via coreboot:
> > Hi everybody,
> >
> > coreboot is shipping AMD's open sourced AGESA for a few generations
> > as part of its tree.
> >
> > Some people advocate dropping the code due to its quality and lack
> >
> In the past, didn't coreboot say that FSP aligned with its goals
Not that it shouldn't still be open-sourced anyway.
___
coreboot mailing list -- coreboot@coreboot.org
To unsubscribe send an email to coreboot-le...@coreboot.org
I remember seeing a guide on Tianocore's wiki on GitHub that I was meaning to
follow after porting coreboot to my laptop. From memory, it's a matter of
adding some "includes" to the package you plan to build. Hopefully isn't much
more than that.
___
> 2. Should the Intel ME and PSP be seen as independent devices like
> the embedded controller? In my opinion it should be, and
> therefore, also does not need to be mentioned on the main page.
If that is the case (and I do agree, ME's feature-set has been more extensive
and invasive
Hi all.
On Mon, 2 Sep 2019 11:13:42 +0200
Paul Menzel wrote:
[...]
> Basically, I agree with Timothy on the problem and the user confusion.
> Puri.sm basically omits the FSP in all their blog posts, and the user
> gets the impression, that the whole firmware is free software [1].
I too agree
excellent points matt
"There is no working bad source so bad that a binary blob is better"
"working bad source should never be replaced by a blob, but only by
improved working bad source"
"we must never remove working bad source that is in use if the only
replacement is a blob"
On Thu, Sep
Greetings all,
Patrick gregori said:
> Mostly chatter on IRC, to be honest. Part of the intent of this mail was
> to surface this more officially.
>
It would be helpful to carry over more details when porting discussions
from IRC. It is always good to be specific how something is broken, not
Interesting discussion! It got me to wondering, having spent a lot of
time in the V1, V2, and V3 trees the last few months.
Is this statement true?
"There is no source so bad that a binary blob is better"
If we take that to be true, then what about this:
"bad source should never be replaced by a
Patrick Georgi via coreboot:
> Hi everybody,
>
> coreboot is shipping AMD's open sourced AGESA for a few generations
> as part of its tree.
>
> Some people advocate dropping the code due to its quality and lack
> of maintenance while others are happy with using the code.
>
> So: to help keep
On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 07:20:49PM +0300, Kyösti Mälkki wrote:
> Would "some people" or these "advocates" be willing to elaborate?
I CC'd Nico and Martin because I seem to remember that we talked
about AGESA (and its quality and/or life cycle). Nico, for example,
seems to advocate scrapping AGESA
On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 5:43 PM Patrick Georgi via coreboot
wrote:
>
> Hi everybody,
>
> coreboot is shipping AMD's open sourced AGESA for a few generations
> as part of its tree.
>
> Some people advocate dropping the code due to its quality and lack
> of maintenance while others are happy with
Hi everybody,
coreboot is shipping AMD's open sourced AGESA for a few generations
as part of its tree.
Some people advocate dropping the code due to its quality and lack
of maintenance while others are happy with using the code.
So: to help keep this code alive, we'd need maintainers - people
Also user of said board.
For me only Nvidia GPUs work correctly.
But using an older Version from 2018, because S3 works there.
Am 10.09.19 um 11:05 schrieb Mike Banon:
> Indeed, this patch -- https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/31448 (
> src/device/pci: Add support for discrete VGA
13 matches
Mail list logo
