[coreboot] Re: Should coreboot.org provide a vendor-agnostic hub for open hardware projects?

Patrick Georgi via coreboot wrote: > And if they run coreboot, why shouldn't we say that? (I'm not saying > that open hardware designs should come with our Hare logo on the > silk screen) They certainly could, and maybe they should if they consume coreboot.org infrastructure, or are in general

[coreboot] Re: Question about PR

bzt wrote: > Thank you! Good to know! Glad it made sense. > I think the problem was I never edit the commit message. The problem was that you didn't use --amend for the second commit. > I always use "-m" because I'm more of a command line guy. > I'll change my habit! You can still use -m

[coreboot] Re: Optiplex 9010 ACPI bug

Hi, Thanks for your attention. I took a slightly deeper look at this and discovered: The offending GPE is GPE08, which judging from the code seems to relate to superio and power button. A temporary workaround before a proper fix would be masking GPE08 on the Linux side.