[coreboot] Re: Building Coreboot with Nix

I did not mention https://github.com/Thrilleratplay/guix-docker as it probably is a red herring. The goal of that repo is to create reproducible build environments using Guix; the output is a docker image that can build coreboot and not coreboot itself.  The ultimate goal is create a

[coreboot] Re: Building Coreboot with Nix

On 4/15/21 6:58 PM, Julian Stecklina wrote: > Hi, Hi Julian, > > I'm trying to build Coreboot with Nix [1] and am facing some issues. I'm > wondering whether someone has already tried this before and can give some > pointers. My specific problem is how to nicely package the toolchain that >

[coreboot] Re: Resource allocator v3

On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 3:17 PM Michal Zygowski wrote: > > Hi Kyösti, > > On 28.04.2021 12:33, Kyösti Mälkki wrote: > > Hi > > > > According to Documentation/releases/coreboot-4.14-relnotes.md we are > > expecting following chipset deprecations due to RESOURCE_ALLOCATOR_V3: > > > > *

[coreboot] Re: Resource allocator v3

Hi Kyösti, On 28.04.2021 12:33, Kyösti Mälkki wrote: > Hi > > According to Documentation/releases/coreboot-4.14-relnotes.md we are > expecting following chipset deprecations due to RESOURCE_ALLOCATOR_V3: > > * northbridge/amd/pi/00630F01 > * northbridge/amd/pi/00730F01 > *

[coreboot] Resource allocator v3

Hi According to Documentation/releases/coreboot-4.14-relnotes.md we are expecting following chipset deprecations due to RESOURCE_ALLOCATOR_V3: * northbridge/amd/pi/00630F01 * northbridge/amd/pi/00730F01 * northbridge/amd/pi/00660F01 (already removed) * northbridge/amd/agesa/family14 *

[coreboot] [coreboot - Cleanup #308] (New) Deal with walkcbfs_asm

Issue #308 has been reported by Patrick Georgi. Cleanup #308: Deal with walkcbfs_asm https://ticket.coreboot.org/issues/308 * Author: Patrick Georgi * Status: New * Priority: Normal * Assignee: * Category: * Target version:

[coreboot] [coreboot - Feature #307] (New) Support FMAP in SeaBIOS

Issue #307 has been reported by Patrick Georgi. Feature #307: Support FMAP in SeaBIOS https://ticket.coreboot.org/issues/307 * Author: Patrick Georgi * Status: New * Priority: Normal * Assignee: * Category: * Target version:

[coreboot] [coreboot - Cleanup #306] (New) Get rid of CBFS master header

Issue #306 has been reported by Patrick Georgi. Cleanup #306: Get rid of CBFS master header https://ticket.coreboot.org/issues/306 * Author: Patrick Georgi * Status: New * Priority: Normal * Assignee: * Category: * Target version:

[coreboot] Re: Dropping the "cbfs master header" file

Hi Arthur, The master header is a legacy thing and I'm in favor of removing it. That said, as you and Michal mentioned, there's some work to do first. I started https://ticket.coreboot.org/issues/306 to help track what's missing. Patrick Am Mi., 28. Apr. 2021 um 08:42 Uhr schrieb Arthur

[coreboot] Re: Dropping the "cbfs master header" file

Hi Arthur, On 28.04.2021 08:41, Arthur Heymans wrote: > Hi > > Currently the "COREBOOT" FMAP cbfs region has a file named "cbfs > master header" at the bottom of this fmap region and the X86 bootblock > has a pointer at 0xFFFC to it. Other ARCH have a "header pointer" > file at the top of

[coreboot] Dropping the "cbfs master header" file

Hi Currently the "COREBOOT" FMAP cbfs region has a file named "cbfs master header" at the bottom of this fmap region and the X86 bootblock has a pointer at 0xFFFC to it. Other ARCH have a "header pointer" file at the top of that FMAP region pointing to it. Currently this file is only used as